SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 538

N.V.RAMANA, S.ABDUL NAZEER, SURYA KANT
Pravin Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :K.L. Janjani, Advocate
For the Respondent(s):B.V. Balaram Das, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Surya Kant, J:

The present civil appeal, which has been heard over videoconferencing, is directed against the order dated 05.05.2009 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Bombay in WP No. 1001/2001, whereby appellant’s plea for quashing disciplinary proceedings and setting­aside a dismissal order on charges of corruption and extraconstitutional conduct while employed as a paramilitary officer, was rejected.

FACTUAL MATRIX

2. The appellant joined the Central Industrial Security Force (“CISF”) in January, 1995 as a Sub­Inspector. After completing requisite training in Hyderabad, he was allocated to Mumbai Office of the Western Zone and posted at the local unit of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (“BPCL”) in March, 1996. Although he was initially deputed to perform shift duty, but since July, 1997 he was deployed in the Crime and Intelligence Wing. As evidenced by an office order dated 08.05.1998, the appellant was specifically entrusted with conducting surprise searches of personnel and taking strict action against anyone indulging in corruption.

3. On 28.02.1999 at around 6PM, Constable Ram Avtar Sharma (CW­1; hereinafter “Sharma”) was commuting in a CISF bus near th


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top