CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE RULES, 2001
(1) These rules may be called the Central Industrial Security Force Rules, 2001.
(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
---------------------
1. Vide G.S.R. 825(E), dated 2nd November, 2001, published in the Gazette of India, Pt. II, Sec. 3(i), dated 5th November, 2001.
In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires,—
(a) “Act” means the Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968 (50 of 1968);
(b) “Appendix” means an appendix to these rules;
(c) “close arrest” means confinement of any enrolled member of the Force within the Force or a detachment of the Force or a post quarter guard, building or tent under charge of a guard;
(d) “Magistrate” means any Magistrate as referred to in section 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973;
(e) “open arrest” means confinement of any enrolled member of the Force within the precinct of any barrack, lines or camp for the time being occupied by any detachment of the Force;
(
(1) The force shall consist of the following three branches, namely:—
(i) Executive Branch;
(ii) Fire Service Branch; and
(iii) Ministerial Branch.
(2) Each Branch shall consist of such supervisory officers (other than the Director General) and enrolled members of the force as the Director General may from time to time specify.
The Supervisory Officers and enrolled members of the Force shall be classified in accordance with the ranks in the following categories, namely:—
(1) (a) Supervisory Officers
(i) Director General;
1[(ia) Additional Director General];
(ii) Inspector General;
(iii) Deputy Inspector General, Deputy Inspector General (Fire), 1 [Director (Medical), Additional Deputy Inspecor General] 2[***];
3(iiia) Senior Commandant, Assistant Inspector General;]
(iv) Commandant, Assistant Inspector General, Assistant Inspector General (Fire), Commandant (Fire), Group Commandant, Principal, Recruits Training Centre, Principal, Fir
Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules, the Director General may, subject to confirmation of the Central Government, grant to an officer of the Force a higher rank than held by him, as a local rank whenever considered necessary by him in the interest of better functioning of the Force—
(i) a local rank shall be conferred by the Director General up to and including the rank of Commandant only;
(ii) local rank to the officers of the level of Deputy Inspector General and above shall be conferred after prior approval of the Ministry of Home Affairs;
(iii) the power of conferring local ranks will not be further delegated by the Director General to any of the officers subordinate to him;
(iv) an officer of the Force who has been granted
(1) The Director General shall be the Head of the Force and shall be responsible for maintaining it in a state of high efficiency, training, discipline and morale and he shall for that purpose take all such steps as he may consider necessary, by way of tours, inspections, examination of records, calling for reports, framing regulations, issuing instructions and giving directive on all matters pertaining to the administration of the Force. He shall in particular guide and direct the supervisory officers and it shall be his duty to ensure that each supervisory officer maintains the Force in his charge at a high level of efficiency and discipline.
(2) The Director General shall keep himself in touch with the Chairman, Managing Directors and General Managers of the Public Sector Undertakings where the Force is deputed and post himself from time to time with the problems and needs of ea
(1) To exercise powers of Head of Department in the respective sectors for inclusion which may consist one or more zones in financial and administrative matters as provided under the various rules.
(2) To closely monitor the crime situations in the field units and adopt proper crime control measures in the respective sectors.
(3) To exercise operational control of the Force, deployed under his charge including those in various Public Sector Undertakings and to render timely directions to the respective Zonal/Plant Deputy Inspectors General. This also includes deployment on Internal Security duties, Election duties, etc.
(4) To guide and direct all concerned to ensure effective security arrangements in the Industrial Undertakings.
(5) To establish an
Legal Comments
"Section" - Section 7 of CISF Rules 2001 deals with transfer of CISF personnel; transfers must be by competent authority per Rule 72, with communications by Regional Officers; guidelines in Circular No.18 of 2004 are subject to administrative/operational/public interest considerations - [Rohitash Choudhary VS Union of India through the Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2016 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1179]
"Introduction" - CISF Rules 2001 govern disciplinary actions, penalties, and due process for members of a paramilitary force; emphasis on discipline, natural justice, and adherence to statutory provisions - [Gulshan Nand Kapoor, S/o. Late Nirmal Kumar Prasad VS Union of India, through the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs - 2023 0 Supreme(Gau) 1241]
"Essential ingredients" - For a valid disciplinary proceeding under Rule 36 (major penalties) and Rule 37 (minor penalties), appointment of a presenting officer (Rule 36(5)(c)) and opportunity to be heard; inquiry must be impartial; cross-examination rights; reasons for penalties must be recorded where required - [R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353], [Union of India VS Barun Kumar Malla - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 618], [Union of India VS M. D. Barman - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 620]
"Scope of Section" - Section 34-36-47 (Rule 34- enforcement of penalties; Rule 36 for major penalties; Rule 37 for minor penalties; Rule 52 appellate enhancement) illustrate the scope of punishment, modification on appeal, and procedural safeguards; high courts scrutinize proportionality and due process - [CONSTABLE ABBAS KHAN VS UNION OF INDIA - 2009 0 Supreme(UK) 543], [Ramswaroop Kajala VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 1013], [Sarepaka Nageswara Rao VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 3121]
"Punishment for Section" - Courts routinely quash or modify penalties when harsh or disproportionate (e.g., major penalties reduced to minor; removal quashed if procedures violated); proportionality and natural justice are controlling standards - [Ramswaroop Kajala VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 1013], [Constable No. 892294004 Harender Singh alias Harender Singh VS Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Home, North Block, New Delhi - 2012 0 Supreme(Jhk) 844], [Ex. Const. R. S. Shekhawat VS Union of India (UOI) - 2008 0 Supreme(Del) 593]
"Format/Rule references" - Rule 25(2) (termination during probation), Rule 26(4) (dismissal for suppression of material facts at attestation), Rule 34(9) (appellate authority power), Rule 36 (charges; evidence; standard of proof preponderance), Rule 37 (minor penalties), Rule 38 (petty punishments), Rule 52 (enhancement on appeal), Rule 54 (revision) provide the procedural framework - [Rohitash Choudhary VS Union of India through the Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2016 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1179], [CONSTABLE ABBAS KHAN VS UNION OF INDIA - 2009 0 Supreme(UK) 543], [M. Sundaramoorthy VS Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force - 1985 0 Supreme(Mad) 53], [Ramswaroop Kajala VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 1013], [M. Bhushan Saklani VS Union Of India - 2020 0 Supreme(UK) 398], [Jamil Akhtar VS The Assistant Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force & Others - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 3401], [Pooran Singh Bisht VS Union of India - 2011 0 Supreme(UK) 669]
"Scope-of-transfer" - Transfers under Rule 72 require competent authority; Circular 18/2004 guidelines are not absolute and must yield to administrative/operational/public interest considerations - [T. Pitchai VS The Deputy Commandant/Adm & Others - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 3340]
"Natural Justice" - Denial of personal hearing in disciplinary proceedings violates natural justice; requirements include hearing before final punishment when charges are not proven; presenting officer appointment is mandatory to ensure impartiality - [Union of India VS Barun Kumar Malla - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 618], [R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353]
"Proportionality" - Courts insist penalties must be proportionate to gravity of misconduct; where damage is minor or circumstances show no intent, major penalties should be avoided (e.g., reduction instead of removal) - [Ramswaroop Kajala VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 1013], [Sarepaka Nageswara Rao VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 3121]
"Stigma/Procedural fairness" - Termination or dismissal cannot be stigmatic or vitiated by improper show-cause or in-remand without following Rule 25/Rule 36 procedures; quashing orders direct fresh proceedings in compliance with Act and Rules - [Suresh Kumar VS U. O. I. & Ors. - 2012 0 Supreme(J&K) 531], [Joseph C. J. VS Union of India - 1995 0 Supreme(Ker) 418]
"Suppression of facts" - Suppression of material facts in attestation/appointment can justify termination; reliance on Rule 26(4) and associated precedents; moral turpitude considerations support termination - [Union of India VS Jai Singh Meena S/o Shri Durga Prasad Meena - 2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 27]
"Back wages/ Dies non" - Rule 55 permits reinstatement with dies-non treatment during compulsory retirement and pension calculations reflecting that interim period; back wages may be denied where exoneration conditions are not met - [K. Lakshmanan VS Union Of India Represented By Secretary, Department of defence, New Delhi - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 13], [Director General Central Industrial Security Force, New Delhi VS M. P. Rao - 2014 0 Supreme(Mad) 3777]
"Remand for fresh decision" - When procedure flawed, courts remand to Disciplinary Authority to pass fresh order in accordance with CISF Act 1968 and Rules; emphasizes strict adherence to the Act/Rules on disciplinary actions - [Joseph C. J. VS Union of India - 1995 0 Supreme(Ker) 418], [K. Lakshmanan VS Union Of India Represented By Secretary, Department of defence, New Delhi - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 13]
"Conclusion on legality" - The CISF Rules provide strong due-process protections (presenting officer, cross-examination, hearing rights); when violated, courts intervene, set aside penalties, or remand for compliant proceedings - [R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353], [Union of India VS M. D. Barman - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 620], [Joseph C. J. VS Union of India - 1995 0 Supreme(Ker) 418]
"Transfer vs. discipline interplay" - Courts consistently hold that transfers are governed by Rule 72 with merit-based exceptions; disciplinary actions require procedural fairness independent of transfer guidelines - [T. Pitchai VS The Deputy Commandant/Adm & Others - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 3340]
"Judicial review scope" - Indian courts narrow review to legality of the process and proportionality of punishment, not re-weighing factual findings except where perverse or Draconian due to natural justice violations - [M. Sundaramoorthy VS Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force - 1985 0 Supreme(Mad) 53], [Kalpajit Chakraborty VS Union of India - 2018 0 Supreme(Cal) 950]
"Key precedents on due process" - Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel (recording reasons before dispensing with inquiry) and Anil Kumar v. Presiding Officer (natural justice in disciplinary) underpin Rule 39/311 considerations and ensuring a fair process - [Pooran Singh Bisht VS Union of India and Others - 2011 0 Supreme(All) 2058], [R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353]
"Dies-non and pension" - Courts sanction dies-non treatment for interromp period but require compliance with Rule 55; pension implications are addressed separately from immediate termination - [K. Lakshmanan VS Union Of India Represented By Secretary, Department of defence, New Delhi - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 13]
"Bottom-line guidance" - For CISF cases, ensure (i) proper appointment of presenting officer; (ii) impartial inquiry; (iii) opportunity for cross-examination and hearing where required; (iv) proportional penalties; (v) adherence to Rule 25/26/34/36/37/52/54 to withstand judicial scrutiny - [R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353], [CONSTABLE ABBAS KHAN VS UNION OF INDIA - 2009 0 Supreme(UK) 543], [Ramswaroop Kajala VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 1013], [S. Balakrishnan VS Union of India, Rep. by Secretary & Others - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 3495]
"Non-available sources note" - If specific details are not present in provided sources, such points are omitted; emphasis remains on cited Rule numbers and reported outcomes - [General guideline from sources]
(1) For proper supervision of the Force, the country shall be divided in zones. A Deputy Inspector General shall be the incharge of each zone. He shall be responsible for maintaining the Force in his charge in a state of high efficiency, training, discipline and morale. For this purpose, he shall inspect the Units and the Industrial Undertakings in Public Sector in his Zone where the Force is deputed at least twice a year and send his Inspection Reports to the Inspector General, giving details of the state of the Force and its administration.
(2) The Deputy Inspector General shall be readily available to the Commandants and shall aid, advice and control them. He shall keep in touch with the Chairman, Managing Directors and General Managers of the Undertakings in his Zone and shall also keep liaison with the State authorities with a view to secure full cooperation between the State
The Force deputed to an Undertaking shall work under the general supervision, direction and control of the Managing Director of that Undertaking. 1[The Unit Commander] of the force shall keep the Managing Director fully informed of all developments including the state of the Force. The Managing Director shall inspect the posts of the Force situated in his Undertaking at least once a year.
+
------------------------
1. Subs. by G.S.R. 462 (E), dated 23rd May, 2003 (w.e.f. 9-6-2003).
(1) The Commandant shall be the head of the Unit. He shall be responsible for the efficiency discipline and morale of the Unit and for the proper management of each branch of the Force under him. He shall periodically inspect the Units of the Force under his command. All orders to the Force under him shall emanate from him and all communication from the Force under him shall pass through him.
(2) The Commandant shall regularly inspect the detachments of the Force posted outside the headquarters and ensure that they remain in a high state of efficiency. He shall ensure that all 1[***] members of the Force under him attend Parade and refresher courses in turn according to a programme. When at headquarters, he shall attend the parade every 2[Monday] and Friday and hold the Orderly Room every Friday.
(3) The Commandant shall be responsible f
(1) The Deputy Commandant shall assist the Commandant in the discharge of his duties; and where he is placed as head of the Unit, he shall discharge all the duties of a Commandant and shall exercise only those financial powers that are delegated to him under the relevant rules.
(2) The Deputy Commandant shall be responsible for the efficiency, discipline and morale of the personnel under him and shall also be responsible for the security of the undertaking or its part entrusted to him.
The Assistant Commandant shall assist the Commandant and unless specifically directed to the contrary in the regulations framed for the purpose he shall perform all the functions of the Commandant when so required by the latter. He shall be responsible for the efficiency, discipline and morale of the personnel under him and shall also be responsible for the security of the Undertaking and any other duties entrusted to him. He will assist Deputy Commandant where the Deputy Commandant is the head of the Unit.]
-----------------------
1. Subs. by G.S.R. 462 (E), dated 23rd May, 2003 (w.e.f. 9-6-2003).
-----------------------
For the other posts, which have been sanctioned/created or may be sanctioned/created from time to time by the Central Government, their duties shall be assigned by the Director General Central Industrial Security Force, by a separate order.]
----------
1. Ins. by G.S.R. 533(E), dated 31st July, 2007 (w.e.f. 3-8-2007).
(1) In making an arrest, under sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Act, the member of the Force shall actually touch or confine the body of the person to be arrested.
(2) If such person forcibly resists the endeavour to arrest him, or attempts to evade the arrest, the member of the Force may use all means necessary to effect the arrest. In case of use of force, it should be minimum, required in that particular situation.
(3) The person arrested shall not be 1[subjected] to more restraint than necessary to prevent his escape.
(4) The member of the Force making the arrest, may search such person, and place in safe custody all articles including weapons, if any, other than necessary wearing apparels, found upon him. An inventory of all such articles shall be prepared in the presence of at least
Legal Comments
"Section" - R.13 (Central Industrial Security Force Rules, 2001) - This section governs a particular disciplinary or administrative aspect under CISF Rules; the provided sources largely address other rules (notably Rule 34, Rule 36, Rule 37, Rule 39, Rule 25, Rule 26, Rule 37(2), Rule 52, etc.). [Source: General CISF Rules compilation and case-law summaries in provided sources]
"Introduction" - The CISF Rules establish a statutory framework for discipline, penalties, and procedure in disciplinary matters within CISF; high court and Supreme Court decisions repeatedly emphasize adherence to due process, natural justice, and disciplinary proportionality. [Sources referencing CISF Rules, e.g., Union of India VS M. D. Barman - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 620; R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353; Gulshan Nand Kapoor, S/o. Late Nirmal Kumar Prasad VS Union of India, through the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs - 2023 0 Supreme(Gau) 1241]
"What does Section Says" - The cited materials illustrate that provisions around major/minor penalties, inquiry requirements, presenting officer duties, and rights to personal hearings are central to Rule 36, Rule 37, Rule 38, Rule 39, Rule 25, Rule 26, Rule 34, Rule 52, and Rule 47; Section 13’s exact text cannot be deduced from the provided excerpts, but the jurisprudence confirms Section 13 interacts with these procedural norms. [Sources: R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353; Union of India VS Barun Kumar Malla - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 618; K. T. Rao VS Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 2027; Gulshan Nand Kapoor, S/o. Late Nirmal Kumar Prasad VS Union of India, through the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs - 2023 0 Supreme(Gau) 1241]
"Essential ingredients" - Key elements repeatedly required by courts:
Procedures for revision/appeal (Rule 54) and necessity of following Act and Rules in disciplinary disposal; [CONSTABLE ABBAS KHAN VS UNION OF INDIA - 2009 0 Supreme(UK) 543; Joseph C. J. VS Union of India - 1995 0 Supreme(Ker) 418]
"Scope of Section" - The section appears to govern disciplinary actions within CISF, aligning with Rule 34 (misconduct), Rule 36 (major penalties and procedures), Rule 37 (minor penalties), Rule 38 (petty punishments), Rule 39 (dismissal/without inquiry constraints), Rule 25/26 (termination during probation), Rule 52 (enhancement by appellate authority), and Rule 47 (de novo inquiry or enhancement. Courts have varied interpretations depending on context, but the overarching scope concerns faithful application of disciplinary procedures and protections against arbitrary punishment. [Multiple sources: Mahender Singh VS Union of India, rep. by Deputy Inspector General/DAE, Central Industrial Security Force - 2013 0 Supreme(AP) 181; Gulshan Nand Kapoor, S/o. Late Nirmal Kumar Prasad VS Union of India, through the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs - 2023 0 Supreme(Gau) 1241; K. R. K. Kutty VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 2378; Neeraj Goliyan VS Union of India - 2016 0 Supreme(Jhk) 743; R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353; M. Sundaramoorthy VS Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force - 1985 0 Supreme(Mad) 53]
"Punishment for Section" - The CISF Rules provide for a spectrum of penalties, from minor (with non-cumulative increments) to major (with pay reductions, removal, or dismissal). Court rulings emphasize proportionality and illegality where punishment is disproportionate, stigmatic, or imposed without due process. Notable outcomes include quashing improper terminations (Suresh Kumar VS U. O. I. & Ors. - 2012 0 Supreme(J&K) 531; Pooran Singh Bisht VS Union of India - 2011 0 Supreme(UK) 669), remitting for fresh proceedings (Joseph C. J. VS Union of India - 1995 0 Supreme(Ker) 418), or upholding proportional minor penalties (Ramswaroop Kajala VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 1013). [Sources: Mahender Singh VS Union of India, rep. by Deputy Inspector General/DAE, Central Industrial Security Force - 2013 0 Supreme(AP) 181; Ramswaroop Kajala VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 1013; Suresh Kumar VS U. O. I. & Ors. - 2012 0 Supreme(J&K) 531; Pooran Singh Bisht VS Union of India - 2011 0 Supreme(UK) 669; Joseph C. J. VS Union of India - 1995 0 Supreme(Ker) 418; R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353]
"Conclusion on transfers and procedural safeguards" - While Section 13 per se is not explicitly described in the sources, the CISF jurisprudence consistently holds that transfer orders must be passed by competent authority under Rule 72 and subject to administrative/operational/public-interest conditions; this reflects the broader disciplined-force governance approach that Section 13 sits within. [T. Pitchai VS The Deputy Commandant/Adm & Others - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 3340]
"Personal hearing requirement" - Denial of personal hearing in disciplinary proceedings violates natural justice and renders the final order invalid where the Inquiry Officer found charges not proven or where rights to cross-examination or presenting officer were improperly handled. [Union of India VS Barun Kumar Malla - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 618; R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353]
"Presenting Officer obligation" - Appointment of a presenting officer is a mandatory requirement under Rule 36(5)(c); failure to appoint or to separate prosecutorial/judicial roles vitiates the inquiry. [R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353]
"Proportionality and minor penalties" - Courts frequently direct reconsideration to impose a minor penalty where the alleged misconduct is not grave or where the damage is minimal, reinforcing the principle that punishment must fit the gravity of misconduct. [Ramswaroop Kajala VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 1013; Sarepaka Nageswara Rao VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 3121]
"Stigma and due process during probation" - Termination simpliciter during probation for concealment of pending criminal cases may be validated or remanded depending on context; but in several cases, stigma-free termination requires compliance with Rule 25(2) and due process. [Pilore Jivaji Shankar Rao VS Union Of India, Through The Home Secretary - 2014 0 Supreme(Pat) 966; Ram Manohar S/o Late Mangal VS Union of India - 2023 0 Supreme(Chh) 714]
"Suppression of material facts" - Termination for suppression of material facts (including prosecution) is generally upheld when such suppression is material to employment; demonstrates the moral turpitude doctrine in CISF rules. [Union of India VS Jai Singh Meena S/o Shri Durga Prasad Meena - 2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 27]
"Disciplinary proceedings and natural justice across layers" - Courts emphasize that the enquiry officer must be impartial, and that the full chain of disciplinary proceedings (inquiry, disagreement note, appellate/revisional authorities) must respect due process; failure in any step may void the order. [Kalpajit Chakraborty VS Union of India - 2018 0 Supreme(Cal) 950; Solanki Girish VS UOI - 2018 0 Supreme(Del) 515]
"Appeals and revision mechanics" - Rule 54 provides for revision by superior authorities, and requires reasonable opportunity to represent against penalties when revision contemplates enhancement; procedural safeguards are essential to avoid arbitrary punishment. [CONSTABLE ABBAS KHAN VS UNION OF INDIA - 2009 0 Supreme(UK) 543]
"Reliance on Civil Service standards" - CISF Rules incorporate conduct and disciplinary norms akin to central civil service standards (e.g., Article 311 of the Constitution) as applicable to quasi-military forces; natural justice standards are importable from constitutional jurisprudence. [R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353; Ambi Ram Das VS Secretary, Department of Home, Government of India - 2009 0 Supreme(Gau) 474]
"Due regard to medical/health considerations" - In cases involving illness or medical grounds, courts examine whether medical evidence was properly considered and whether the disciplinary authority gave due weight to mitigating health factors before imposing penalties. [Solanki Girish VS UOI - 2018 0 Supreme(Del) 515; K. Lakshmanan VS Union Of India Represented By Secretary, Department of defence, New Delhi - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 13]
"Rail-and-institutional fairness" - Where the appellate authority has full power to enhance, it should still ensure there is a valid basis and compliance with Rule 52; otherwise, interference by the court may occur. [CONSTABLE ABBAS KHAN VS UNION OF INDIA - 2009 0 Supreme(UK) 543]
"Corruption and misconduct" - In cases involving corruption or gratification charges, the court often defers to the findings of the Enquiry Officer if supported by evidence, while ensuring proportionate punishment and proper procedural structure. [B. Satyanarayan VS Inspector General, New Delhi - 2015 0 Supreme(Ori) 163]
"Suppression or misrepresentation in attestation" - Suppression of material facts in attestation or misrepresentation can justify termination under Rule 26(4), reflecting the gravity of false declaration in entry into service. [Union of India VS Jai Singh Meena S/o Shri Durga Prasad Meena - 2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 27]
Central Industrial Security Force Rules, 2001 (selected provisions and case-law applications) [R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353; Union of India VS Barun Kumar Malla - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 618; Ramswaroop Kajala VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 1013; T. Pitchai VS The Deputy Commandant/Adm & Others - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 3340; Joseph C. J. VS Union of India - 1995 0 Supreme(Ker) 418; CONSTABLE ABBAS KHAN VS UNION OF INDIA - 2009 0 Supreme(UK) 543]
Whenever a search of a person and of his 1[belongings] is conducted under section 12 of the Act, an inventory shall be prepared in the presence of the two respectable witnesses and a copy of the inventory duly signed by the witnesses and the person who conducted the search, shall be given to the person concerned after obtaining due receipt. The property so found on such search, shall also be sent to the police alongwith the person. If nothing is found on such search, a nil inventory statement duly signed shall be sent to the police alongwith the person.
The prescribed rank for the purposes of sub-section (1) of section 12 of the Act shall be the Head Constable.
Subject to the provisions of the Act and these rules, appointments to the post of Inspector shall be made by the Deputy Inspector General concerned and to the ranks of Sub-Inspector, Assistant Sub-Inspector, Head Constable, Constable and Followers shall be made by the Commandant.
No person shall be eligible for appointment to the Force unless—
(a) (i) he is a citizen of India; or
(ii) he belongs to such categories of persons as may, from time to time, be declared by the Central Government as being eligible for appointment to the Force;
(b) he bears a good moral character;
(c) he obtains a health certificate in the form prescribed in Appendix “C” certified by a Medical Officer of Central Industrial Security Force or any other Medical Officer or Assistant Surgeon belonging to Grade 1 of any Government Hospital or Dispensary.
No person,—
(a) who has entered into or contracted a marriage with a person having a spouse living; or
(b) who, having a spouse living, has entered into or contracted a marriage with another person,
shall be eligible for appointment to the Force:
Provided that the Central Government may, if satisfied that such marriage is permissible under the personal law applicable to such person and the other party to the marriage and there are other grounds for so to do, exempt any person from the operation of this rule.
The name of posts of members of the Force, their number and classification and the scale of pay attached thereto shall be as specified in the Recruitment Rules as amended from time to time.
The method of recruitment, age limits, qualifications and other matters relating to each of the said post shall be as specified in the Recruitment Rules as amended from time to time.
Every enrolled member of the Force except those appointed on transfer or deputation shall execute at the time of his initial appointment an agreement in the form specified in Appendix “A”.
Each of the three branches mentioned in rule 3 shall form a separate cadre for the purpose of seniority, promotion and confirmation.
(1) (a) During the period of deputation, the officer on deputation shall be governed by the provisions of the Act and the rules and regulations made thereunder:
Provided that the provisions of rules 58, 59 and 71 shall not apply to him.
(b) Without prejudice to the foregoing, every such officer shall be subject to the rules of discipline applicable to the corresponding rank to the Force.
(2) Save as aforesaid, the other terms and conditions of deputation shall be such as may be agreed upon between the lending authority and the Central Government.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules, the Central Government or the Director General, as the case may be, may, without assigning any reason terminate the period of deputation of any officer
Legal Comments
"Transfer" - Transfers must be issued by the competent authority under Rule 72 CISF Rules 2001; guidelines (Circular No.18 of 2004) are subject to administrative/operational/public-interest considerations. [T. Pitchai VS The Deputy Commandant/Adm & Others - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 3340]
"Competent authority" - Court held transfer orders passed by the competent authority per Rule 72; no merit in challenges where transfers followed the prescribed authority chain. [T. Pitchai VS The Deputy Commandant/Adm & Others - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 3340]
"Guidelines vs. merits" - Guidelines are not absolute; transfers can be affected by administrative/operational needs and public interest; representations may be considered. [T. Pitchai VS The Deputy Commandant/Adm & Others - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 3340]
"Backwages limitation" - Rule 55 governs backwages; relief denied where the employee was not exonerated from all charges; backwages not granted on modified punishments. [Director General Central Industrial Security Force, New Delhi VS M. P. Rao - 2014 0 Supreme(Mad) 3777]
"Backwages - limitation" - Denial of backwages where not fully exonerated; modification of punishment does not automatically entail back wages. [Director General Central Industrial Security Force, New Delhi VS M. P. Rao - 2014 0 Supreme(Mad) 3777]
"Termination cadences" - Termination/quashing: Rule 25 governs probationary termination; stigmatic grounds require recording fitness/opportunity; termination during probation must follow Rule 25(2). [Suresh Kumar VS U. O. I. & Ors. - 2012 0 Supreme(J&K) 531], [Pilore Jivaji Shankar Rao VS Union Of India, Through The Home Secretary - 2014 0 Supreme(Pat) 966]
"Stigmatic termination" - Termination cannot rest on stigmatic grounds without opportunity to be heard; Court quashed termination and remitted for proper action. [Suresh Kumar VS U. O. I. & Ors. - 2012 0 Supreme(J&K) 531]
"Dismissal with process" - Dismissal under Rule 8(a) (conduct/discipline) requires reasonable opportunity; improper opportunity may render dismissal invalid. [Ex. -HC Chet Ram son of Sri R. P. Yadav VS Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs - 2016 0 Supreme(Pat) 745], [Union of India VS Barun Kumar Malla - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 618]
"Rule 36 and natural justice" - Rule 36(21)(III) requires fair opportunity; denial of personal hearing before final punishment violates natural justice and invalidates final order. [Union of India VS Barun Kumar Malla - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 618], [Union of India VS M. D. Barman - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 620]
"Personal hearing" - Denial of personal hearing in disciplinary proceedings when charges are not proven or where inquiry findings were overturned is violative; reinstatement/voiding may follow. [Union of India VS Barun Kumar Malla - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 618], [R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353]
"Presenting officer" - Mandatory appointment of a presenting officer under Rule 36(5)(c); absence or dual role of inquiry officer as prosecutor/judge vitiates proceedings; undermines natural justice. [R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353]
"Cross-examination" - Denial of cross-examination or improper opportunity renders the process incurably irregular; remedy includes setting aside and reinstatement. [R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353]
"Rule 34 misconduct" - Minor penalties distinguished under Rule 34; proportionate punishment; serious misconduct may warrant major penalties. [Mahender Singh VS Union of India, rep. by Deputy Inspector General/DAE, Central Industrial Security Force - 2013 0 Supreme(AP) 181], [K. T. Rao VS Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 2027]
"Proportionality" - Punishment must be proportionate to gravity of proven misconduct; excessive penalties are quashed and remanded for lesser penalties. [Ramswaroop Kajala VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 1013], [K. T. Rao VS Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 2027]
"Suppression of facts" - Suppression of material facts at appointment can justify termination; moral turpitude considerations; Rule 26(4) supports termination for false information. [Union of India VS Jai Singh Meena S/o Shri Durga Prasad Meena - 2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 27]
"Suppression and acquittal" - Acquittal does not automatically shield from consequences if suppression of material facts occurred; termination upheld where material suppression found. [Union of India VS Jai Singh Meena S/o Shri Durga Prasad Meena - 2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 27]
"Disciplinary procedure adherence" - Courts emphasize adherence to CISF Act 1968 and CISF Rules 2001 in disciplinary proceedings; deviations may lead to quashing and remand. [Joseph C. J. VS Union of India - 1995 0 Supreme(Ker) 418], [Kalpajit Chakraborty VS Union of India - 2018 0 Supreme(Cal) 950]
"Natural justice in disciplinary actions" - Across several judgments, denial of fair hearing, or biased inquiry officers leads to invalidation and reinstatement orders. [R. K. Sharma VS UNION OF INDIA - 2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 353], [Union of India VS M. D. Barman - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 620]
"Rule 37 minor penalties" - When a specific request for enquiry is made for minor penalties, disciplinary authority must respond or conduct enquiry; otherwise, improper penalty may be quashed. [Jamil Akhtar VS The Assistant Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force & Others - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 3401]
"Rule 39 during probation or criminal case" - Termination during probation or based on pending criminal case can be permissible if guided by statutory interpretations; depends on whether stigma is attached and due process followed. [Pilore Jivaji Shankar Rao VS Union Of India, Through The Home Secretary - 2014 0 Supreme(Pat) 966], [Pooran Singh Bisht VS Union of India and Others - 2011 0 Supreme(All) 2058]
"Rule 47 – enhancement on appeal" - Appellate authority may enhance penalties under Rule 47(2)(c)(i) if evidence supports gravity; no irregularity if proceedings were proper. [Ram Manohar S/o Late Mangal VS Union of India - 2023 0 Supreme(Chh) 714]
"Dies non and pension treatment" - Reinstatement as 'dies non' and pension qualification under Rule 55; period treated for pension purposes and does not affect the last pay. [K. Lakshmanan VS Union Of India Represented By Secretary, Department of defence, New Delhi - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 13], [K. Lakshmanan VS Union Of India Represented By Secretary, Department of defence, New Delhi - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 13]
"Disciplinary reformative relief" - In several cases, the court remands for re-determination under Act/Rules, directing authorities to proceed afresh per CISF framework. [Joseph C. J. VS Union of India - 1995 0 Supreme(Ker) 418], [M. A. Rahman VS Officer In-Charge, Office of the Deputy Commandant C. I. S. F. Unit - 2014 0 Supreme(Ker) 876]
"Statutory interpretation - purpose of CISF" - Act and Rules should be construed in light of their statutory purpose; leave circulars as guidelines rather than immutable commands. [Ram Nath Giri VS Union of India - 1976 0 Supreme(Pat) 127], [T. Pitchai VS The Deputy Commandant/Adm & Others - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 3340]
"Cross-cutting principle" - Across decisions, due process, proportionality, and natural justice are recurring touchstones for upholding, quashing, or remanding CISF disciplinary outcomes. [Kalpajit Chakraborty VS Union of India - 2018 0 Supreme(Cal) 950], [Sarepaka Nageswara Rao VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 3121]
"Compensatory orders for outdoor accommodation" - Rule 61 on government accommodation and house rent allowance; order to pay HRA when outdoor residence permitted. [Randhir Singh vs Central Industrial Security Force - Delhi (2011)]
"Corruption and misconduct" - Courts treat corruption-related misconduct and gross indiscipline as serious; penalties must reflect gravity; evidence-based upholding of punishment. [B. Satyanarayan VS Inspector General, New Delhi - 2015 0 Supreme(Ori) 163], [Sarepaka Nageswara Rao VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 3121]
Note: The citations in square brackets refer to the provided source entries.
Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules specially deserving Constable or Head Constable who have put in fifteen or twenty years of service may be promoted to the rank of Head Constable or Assistant Sub-Inspector, as the case may be, on the basis of their service records by the Commandant with the approval of the Deputy Inspector General, but the total number of such promotions shall not exceed 10% of the posts which may be filled by the method of promotion.
(1) Every member of the Force except those appointed on deputation/absorption, shall be on probation for the period specified in relevant column of the Recruitment Rules:
Provided that in the absence of a specific order of confirmation or a declaration of satisfactory completion of probation, a member of the Force shall be deemed to be on probation:
Provided further that no member of the Force shall ordinarily be kept on probation for more than twice the period prescribed in respective Recruitment Rules.
0
(2) If during the period of probation the appointing authority is of the opinion that a member of the Force is not fit for permanent appointment, the appointing authority may discharge him 1[or terminated the services] from the Force after issue o
1[(1) Where the appointing authority has terminated the services of probationer, the Inspector, General may on his own motion or otherwise, reopen the case and after making such enquiry as he thinks fit may; (i) confirm the action taken by the appointing authority; (ii) withdraw the notice; (iii) reinstate the probationer in service; or (iv) make such other order in the case as he may consider proper:
Provided that except in special circumstances, which should be recorded in writing, no case shall be reopened under this sub-rule after expiry of three months—
(a) from the date of notice, in a case where notice is given;
(b) from the date of termination of service in a case where no notice is given.]
(2) Where a probationer is reinstated in servic
Nothing in these rules shall effect reservations, relaxation of age limit and other concessions required to be provided for the Scheduled Castes, the Schedule Tribes, Ex-servicemen and other special categories of persons, in accordance with the order issued by the Central Government from time to time in this regard.
Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing rules, where, in the interest of the formation and the due functioning of the Force, it is necessary so to do relaxation under these rules (other than the requirement of
being medically fit) may be made at the time of direct recruitment by the Director General—
(i) Constable—any of the eligibility criteria.
(ii) Followers—age limit only.
The Director General shall frame Training Manual, Establishment Manual as well as other manuals for administration of the Force with the approval of the Central Government.
On appointment, each recruit or cadet shall be required to solemnly affirm his allegiance in the form given in Appendix “B” and shall receive a certificate of appointment as prescribed in section 6 of the Act.
(1) Supervisory officers shall be governed by the rules applicable to the officers of the Central Government of corresponding class in respect of disciplinary proceedings.
(2) The enrolled members of the Force shall in such matters be governed by the rules in this Chapter.
(1) The disciplinary authority in respect of an enrolled member of the Force for the purpose of imposing any particular penalty or the passing of any disciplinary order shall be the authority specified in this behalf in Schedule I under whose administrative control the enrolled member is serving and shall include any authority mentioned in the said Schedule superior to such authority.
1[(2) Whenever an enrolled member of the Force is deployed for operational duty or any other duty or course of training outside the place of his permanent posting then a supervisory officer under whose control such member has been so deployed shall be competent to place him under suspension. Such supervisory officer shall refer the matter to concerned disciplinary authority as mentioned in sub-rule (1).]
(3) A disciplinary authority competent under Schedule
(1) The appointing authority or any authority to which it is subordinate or the disciplinary authority or any other authority empowered in that behalf by the President by general or special order may place an enrolled member of the Force under suspension—
(a) where a disciplinary proceedings against him is contemplated or is pending; or
(b) where a case against him in respect of any criminal offence is under investigation, inquiry or trial; or
(c) where in the opinion of the authority aforesaid, he engaged himself in activities prejudicial to the interest of the security of the State; Provided that where the order of suspension is made by an authority lower than the appointing authority, such authority shall forthwith report to the appointing authority the circumstances in which the order w
The following penalties may, for good and sufficient reasons and as hereinafter provided, be imposed on an enrolled member of the Force, namely:—
Major Penalties —
(i) dismissal from service which shall ordinarily be a disqualification for future employment under the Government;
(ii) removal from service which shall not be a disqualification for future employment under the Government;
(iii) compulsory retirement;
(iv) reduction to a lower time scale of pay, grade, post or service which shall ordinarily be a bar to the promotion of the Government servant to the time scale of pay, grade, post or service from which he was reduced with or without further directions regarding conditions of restoration to
Head Constable, Constable and Follower may also be awarded, as punishment, extra drill, guard, fatigue or other duty for a term not exceeding fourteen days.
Explanation.—Petty punishments shall ordinarily be awarded in Orderly Room as provided in rule 38 of this Chapter.
(1) Without prejudice to the provisions of the Public Servants1[(Inquiries)] Act, 1850 (37 of 1850), no order imposing on an enrolled member of the Force any of the penalties as specified in clauses (i) to (v) of rule 34 shall be made except after an inquiry held, as far as may be, in the manner hereinafter provided.
(2) Whenever the disciplinary authority is of the opinion that there are grounds for inquiring into the truth of any imputation of misconduct or misbehaviour against an enrolled member of the Force, it may itself inquire into, or appoint an authority to inquire into the truth thereof.
Explanation. —Where the disciplinary authority itself holds the inquiry, any reference in sub-rules (7) to (18) of this rule shall be construed as a reference to the disciplinary authority.
2[(2A)
(1) No order imposing any of minor penalties specified in rule 34 shall be made except after—
(a) informing the enrolled member in writing of the imputations of misconduct or misbehaviour on which it is proposed to be taken and giving him a reasonable opportunity of making such representation as he wishes to make against the proposal;
(b) holding an inquiry, if the disciplinary authority so desires, in the manner laid down in sub-rules (3) to (22) of rule 36;
(c) taking the representation, if any, submitted by the enrolled member under clause (a) and the record of inquiry, if any, held under clause (b) into consideration; and
(d) recording the findings on each imputation of misconduct or misbehaviour.
Petty breaches of discipline and trifling cases of misconduct by the enrolled members of the Force not above the rank of the Head Constable shall be inquired into and disposed of in the Orderly Room. The punishment enumerated in rule 35 may be awarded, making a record of a summary proceedings in the Orderly Room register which shall be maintained for keeping record of such punishments. There shall be no appeal against the punishment awarded in the Orderly Room.
Notwithstanding anything contained in rules 36 to 38—
(i) where any penalty is imposed on an enrolled member of the Force on the ground of conduct which has led to his conviction on a criminal charge; or
(ii) where the disciplinary authority is satisfied for reasons to be recorded by it in writing that it is not reasonably practicable to hold an inquiry in the manner provided in these rules; or
(iii) where the President is satisfied that in the interest of the security of the State, it is not expedient to hold any inquiry in the manner provided in these rules, the disciplinary authority may consider the circumstances of the case and make such orders thereon as it deems fit:
Provided that the enrolled member of the Force may be given an opportu
(1) Where an order of suspension is made or a disciplinary proceeding is conducted against an enrolled member of the Force whose services have been borrowed from another department of the Central Government or from a State Government or an authority subordinate thereto, the authority lending his services (hereinafter in these rules referred to as the “lending authority”) shall forthwith be informed of the circumstances leading to the order of suspension of the enrolled member of the Force or the commencement of the disciplinary proceedings, as the case may be.
(2) In the light of the findings in the disciplinary proceeding conducted against such an enrolled member of the Force, if the disciplinary authority is of the opinion that any of the penalties specified in clauses (vi) to (x) of rule 34 should be imposed on him, it may, subject to the provisions of sub-rule (22)(i) of rule 3
(1) Where the services of an enrolled member of the Force are lent to another department of the Central Government or to a State Government or other authority 1[hereinafter] in this rule referred to as “borrowing authority” the borrowing authority shall have the powers of the appointing authority for the purpose of placing such enrolled member of the Force under suspension and of the disciplinary authority for the purpose of conducting a disciplinary against him:
Provided that the borrowing authority shall forthwith inform the authority which lent the services of such enrolled member of the Force hereinafter in this rule referred to as ‘the lending authority’ of the circumstances leading to the order of suspension of such enrolled member of the Force or the commencement of the disciplinary proceeding, as the case may be.
(2) In the light
No enrolled member of the Force shall be reduced to a rank lower than that to which he was first appointed to the service nor shall be reduced permanently in the sense that he may never be eligible for re-promotion however meritorious his subsequent service may be. When reduction to a lower rank class, grade or a lower time scale or a lower stage in the time scale is ordered, the order shall also specify the position in the lower rank on such reduction as well as the period for which the reduction shall hold good.
In case of withholding of increment as a punishment, the order shall state the period for which the increment is to be withheld and whether it shall have the effect of postponing further increments.
An enrolled member of the Force may appeal against the order of suspension to the authority, to which the authority which made or is deemed to have made the order is immediately subordinate.
Notwithstanding anything contained in this chapter, no appeal shall lie against—
(i) any order of interlocutory nature or of the nature of 1[step-in-aid of] the final disposal of disciplinary proceedings other than an order of suspension; and
(ii) any order passed by an inquiring authority in the course of inquiry under rule 36.
----------------------
1. Subs. by G.S.R. 462 (E), dated 23rd May, 2003 (w.e.f. 9-6-2003).----------------------
(1) An enrolled member may prefer an appeal against all or any of the following orders, namely:—
(i) an order of suspension made or deemed to have been made under rule 33;
(ii) an order imposing any of the penalties specified in rule 34, made by the disciplinary authority or by any appellate or revising authority.
(2) Such appeal shall be made to the authority immediately superior to the authority who has imposed the penalty.
Note.—
(i) Appeal against the order of Deputy Inspector General shall lie to the Sector Inspector General and against the order of the Sector Inspector General to the Director General.
(ii) Appeal against the order of the Deputy In
No appeal under these rules shall be entertained unless it is submitted within a period of 30 days from the date on which the appellant received a copy of the order appealed against:
Provided that the appellate authority may entertain the appeal after the expiry of the said period, if it is satisfied that the appellant had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal in time.
(1) Every enrolled member preferring an appeal shall do so separately in his own name.
(2) The appeal shall be addressed to the authority to whom the appeal 1[lies and it] shall contain all material statements and arguments on which the appellant relies, shall not contain any disrespectful or improper language, and shall be complete in itself.
----------------------
1. Subs. by G.S.R. 462 (E), dated 23rd May, 2003 (w.e.f. 9-6-2003).
----------------------
The appellant shall submit such appeal to the authority which made the order appealed against:
Provided that if the appellant at the time of submitting such appeal is not serving under that authority, shall submit the appeal to the authority under whom he is serving and that authority shall forward it forthwith to the appropriate authority. If the appellant is not in service, he shall submit his appeal direct to the appellate authority, a copy of the appeal will also be forwarded by the appellant to the authority which made the order appealed against.
(1) The authority which made the order appealed against, may withhold the appeal if—
+
(i) it is an appeal against an order for which no appeal lies under rule 45; or
(ii) it is not in conformity with the provisions of rule 48; or
(iii) it is not submitted within the period specified in rule 47 and no sufficient cause is shown for the delay; or
(iv) it is repetition of any appeal already decided and no new facts of circumstances are adduced:
Provided that an appeal withheld on the ground only that it was not in conformity with provisions of rule 48, shall be returned to the appellant and if re-submitted within 30 days thereof, after compliance with the
The authority which made the order appealed against, shall on receipt of such appeal, forward the same together with the relevant records, to the appellate authority without any avoidable delay and without waiting for any directions from the appellate authority unless the appeal is withheld under rule 50.
(1) In the case of an appeal against an order of suspension, the appellate authority shall consider whether in the light of the provisions of 1 [rule 33] and having regard to the circumstances of the case, the order of suspension is justified or not and confirm or revoke the order accordingly.
(2) In the case of an appeal against the order imposing any of the penalties specified in rule 34, or enhancing any penalty imposed under the said rules, the appellate authority shall consider—
(a) whether the procedure laid down in these rules has been complied with and if not whether such non-compliance has resulted in the violation of any provisions of the Constitution of India or in the failure of justice;
(b) whether the findings of the disciplinary authority are warranted on the basis of the evi
The authority which made the order appealed against shall give effect to the orders passed by the appellate authority.
(1) Any authority superior to the authority making the order may either on his own motion or otherwise call for the records of any inquiry and revise any order made under these rules, and may—
(a) confirm, modify or set aside the order; or
(b) confirm, reduce, enhance or set aside the penalty imposed by the order, or impose any penalty where no penalty has been imposed; or
(c) remit the case to the authority which made the order or to any other authority directing such authority to make such further enquiry as it may consider proper in the circumstances of the case; or
(d) pass such order as it may deem fit, within six months of the date of communication of the order proposed to be revised:
Provid
Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules a disciplinary authority while passing final order to impose a penalty upon an enrolled member of the Force or an appellate authority or a revising authority may, on reinstatement of an enrolled member of the Force in service after setting aside a penalty of dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement without exonerating such enrolled member of the Force of the charges which resulted in any of these penalties, after giving an opportunity to the enrolled member of the Force concerned to show cause against such action and for reasons to be recorded in writing, order that the intervening period between the date of dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement, as the case may be, and the date of reinstatement be treated as dies-non for purposes of service.
(1) Any enrolled member of the Force may submit a petition in respect of any matter connected with his official position in which his personal interests are involved other than a matter covered by the rule relating to appeals and revision.
(2) Each such enrolled member of the Force shall submit a petition solely relating to his individual case.
(3) Joint petitions of any kind whatsoever shall not be taken notice of and submission of such petitions shall be deemed to be an act of indiscipline.
(4) Such petition shall be in proper form and not couched in improper language and be submitted to the immediate superior even if the petitioner be on leave at the time. A petition submitted in contravention of this rule shall be summarily rejected.
(5) Such im
The supervisory officers and enrolled members of the Force are forbidden from resorting to any method other than that prescribed in these rules for pressing their claims or for obtaining redress of alleged grievances or reversal, any such attempt on their part shall be deemed to be an act of indiscipline.
(1) The appointing authority may during the period of probation or thereafter permit any member of the Force to resign from his post with effect from such date as may be specified in the order accepting his resignation:
Provided that before acceptance of resignation of any such member of the force up to the period of ten years from the date of appointment in the Force, for reasons other than accepting a job elsewhere for which cadre clearance has been given, shall be required to refund the cost of training imparted to him in the Force or a sum equal to three months’ pay and allowances, whichever is more.
(2) The resignation of a member of the Force who is under trial or whose conduct is under inquiry may be refused.
Whenever a member of the Force ceases to be such member for any reason whatsoever, a discharge certificate in the Form specified in Appendix “D” annexed to these rules shall be given to him.
Every enrolled member ceasing to be a member of the Force shall surrender to his immediate superior his certificate of appointment which shall thereupon be submitted to the Commandant.
(1) Normally, the undertaking where the Force has been deputed shall provide accommodation in the township itself to all supervisory officers and at the rate of 45 per cent married and 55 per cent unmarried or as amended by the Central Government from time to time, to the enrolled members of the Force.
(2) The accommodation to the enrolled member of the Force shall be rent-free but where such facilities are not available they shall get house rent allowance in lieu thereof as applicable to other central government employees.
(3) The members of the Force shall also get compensation in lieu of married accommodation in terms of orders issued by the Government from time to time in this respect. The compensation shall be payable to that percentage of members of the Force who are entitled to get married accommodation minus those members of the
Members of the Force shall be entitled to the facilities of the Central Government Health Scheme and in places where these facilities are not available, they shall be governed by the Central Civil Services (Medical Attendant) Rules, 1944:
Provided that when they are deployed in a Public Sector Undertaking,—
(i) in a case where such Public Sector Undertaking provides medical facilities to its employees, such members of the Force shall be entitled to avail such facilities free of charge; and
(ii) if such facilities are not available, the authorised medical attendant for such members of the Force will be as provided in Central Civil Services (Medical Attendant) Rules, 1944.
The Supervisory officers and 1[enrolled members of the Force] shall be governed by the Leave Rules as are applicable to employees of the Central Government, excepting that they shall be entitled to fifteen days Casual Leave in a calender year in respect of field formation where no specific working hours in a day or working weeks are prescribed and entitlement of Casual leave in static formation like Force Head Quarters, Sector Head Quarters, etc., of Central Industrial Security Force will be 8 days in a calender year as per Ministry of Home Affairs’ Office Memorandum No. 27012/6/98/PF.I/ 419 dated 7-7-2000. The Regularisation of leave will be subject to orders issued by Central Government from time to time.
-------------------------
1. Subs. by G.S.R. 462 (E), dated 23rd May, 2003 (w.
The Supervisory officers and enrolled members of the Force on leave may be recalled at any time by the authority empowered to sanction their leave. They may be directed to report for duty either at Headquarters or to proceed direct to the place at which their services are required.
In either case, travelling allowance as on tour (by shortest route) for the return journey may be allowed to them at the discretion of the authority recalling them from leave.
(1) Free Leave Pass and Leave Travel Concession shall be admissible to the members of the Force of and below the rank of 1[Inspector] as follows, namely:—
(a) When living away from their families one Free Leave Pass every year from places of duty to the railway stations nearest to their towns and return subject to the Leave Travel Concession for their families in a block period of two years.
(b) In case they are living with their families and propose to avail themselves of Leave Travel Concession for their families also, they shall be entitled to Free Leave Pass to home towns and return for self only once in two years and Leave Travel Concession (once in a block period of two years) to the family members under the normal Leave Travel Concession Rules applicable to other Central Government employees.
&
Monetary rewards may be granted to the enrolled members of the Force non-gazetted Government servants, employees and workers of the industrial undertakings and members of the public in accordance with rules 67, 68 and 69.
(1) Monetary rewards may be granted only to the enrolled members of the Force for—
(a) doing outstanding work, requiring special courage, skill or initiative such as—
(i) the arrest of a criminal; or
(ii) securing of information leading to the detection of a crime or matters connected therewith; or
(iii) making exceptionally good enquiries; or
(iv) an encounter with a criminal, if connection with the protection, safeguard and security of an industrial undertaking;
(b) doing work of a less outstanding nature but requiring prompt, honest and intelligent observance of, and obedience to order so as to be of material assistance in the protecti
(1) The supervisory officers are empowered, subject to the budget provisions of the Force, to offer and grant monetary rewards under rule 67 as prescribed by the Central Government from time to time.
(2) A monetary reward under rule 67 shall be granted by an officer competent to grant the same if he is of opinion, for reasons to be recorded in writing, that the person fulfils the requirements in this behalf.
(3) The order granting such monetary reward shall indicate the reasons therefor and the provisions of rule 67 under which it is granted.
A supervisory officer of the Force may permit an enrolled member of the Force to accept monetary reward offered by a Managing Director of an industrial undertaking for a purpose relatable to sub-rule (1) of rule 67.
Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency, precision, and security, tailored exclusively for legal professionals.