1. Enlargement of commission terms regarding subordinate court staff pay structure and implementation of pay scales for judicial officers. (Para 1 , 2 )
1997 Supreme(SC) 1739
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.S. Verma, CJI., G.T. Nanavati, B.N. Kirpal, JJ.
All India Judges Asson., others - Petitioners
Versus
Union of India, others - Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 1022 of 1989
Decided On, 13-11-1997
The Court directed State/UT governments to ensure regular salary payments to Judicial Officers at least according to current pay scales and urged the prompt adoption of new pay scales to prevent salary anomalies between Judicial Officers and supporting staff.
Headnote:
Public service Commission – Jurisdiction - Structure of the staff associated with the functioning of subordinate courts and, therefore response of States/UTs has to be ascertained - Court had given notice to Advocate General of each State and he or some other counsel for States is present - It is only the Advocate General/ counsel of some of States who have expressed their reservation in this behalf or who require some more time for consideration - It is, therefore, appropriate that each Advocate General/counsel for the Slate/UT which has any reservation about this matter, i.e., enlargement of the terms of reference of Settee Commission should file same in writing during course of the day - In respect of the States/UTs on whose behalf no reservation/ objection is filed today with a copy advocate on record for the Union of India, it will be assumed that the State/UT concerned has no objection to such enlargement of the terms of reference of Commission - Learned Additional, Solicitor General may, therefore, proceed in this matter on the basis of the response so made by the end of the day – Held, Learned amicus curiae has brought to our notice information conveyed to him that there is some practical difficulty which has arisen on account of at which payment of salaries to the Judicial Officers has to be made in view of the recommendations of Fifth Pay Commission and at some places it is also apprehended that till the final decision is taken by framing the new pay scales and adopting the same, payment-of salary to the Judicial Officers even according to the current pay scales may be deferred – Court do hope that no such incongruous situation would be permitted by any of the State/UT Government - Learned Advocate General/counsel for States/UTs would ensure that such a situation does not arise any place. However, with a view to ensure that even a single Judicial Officer in any State/UT does not suffer on account of any ambiguity/vacillation in the mind of any concerned authority Court direct that every State/ UT Government will ensure regular payment to every Judicial Officer at least according to the current pay scales till new pay scales are framed and adopted or any beneficial order is made as an interim measure by Commission - It is also important that new pay scales are framed and adopted for Judicial Officers in every State/UT as early as possible on account of the fact that revision of the pay scales of even the supporting staff pursuant to recommendations of the Fifth Pay Commission has the result not un often of many members of supporting staff drawing a higher salary according to their new pay scales than their superior Judicial Officers who may be drawing salary according to the current pay scale only - It is imperative that prompt action should be taker by all the concerned authorities to prevent any such anomalous situation - Learned Additional Solicitor General as well as Advocate General/counsel for the States/UTs assure us that concerned governments would ensure prompt and full compliance of this order in letter and spirit immediately. The Registry is to send copy of this order to Chief Secretary of each State/UT and also to Onion Law Secretary, Union Home Secretary and Union Finance Secretary – Order accordingly
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Certain States and Union Territories expressed reservations regarding the enlargement of the commission's terms of reference. (Para 1 )
3. Deferment of judicial salaries is impermissible, and pay anomalies where supporting staff earn more than judicial officers must be avoided. (Para 2 , 3 )
4. State governments are obligated to ensure regular salary payments to judicial officers at least at current scales to prevent hardship and administrative anomalies. (Para 2 , 3 )
5. States must file reservations regarding commission terms by a deadline; regular salary payments to judicial officers must be ensured. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 )
6. Can the payment of salaries to judicial officers be deferred pending the adoption of new pay scales?
No, the court directed that every State/UT government must ensure regular payment to every judicial officer at least according to current pay scales until new scales are framed and adopted or interim beneficial orders are made. (Para 2 )
7. How should the court handle objections from States regarding the enlargement of a commission's terms of reference?
The court allowed States/UTs to file reservations in writing by a specific deadline, failing which it would be assumed that the State/UT has no objection to the enlargement. (Para 1 )
8. What is the court's view on pay anomalies between judicial officers and supporting staff?
The court observed that it is imperative to prevent anomalous situations where supporting staff draw higher salaries than their superior judicial officers due to the implementation of new pay scales. (Para 3 )
JUDGMENT :
1. The learned Additional Solicitor General informs us that the consent of the States/Union Territories may be required for enlargement of the terms of reference of the Shetty Commission to include the question of pay structure of the staff associated with the functioning of subordinate courts and, therefore, the response of the States/UTs has to be ascertained. We had given notice to the Advocate General of each State and he or some other counsel for the States is present. It is only the Advocate General/ counsel of some of the States who have expressed their reservation in this behalf or who require some more time for consideration. It is, therefore, appropriate that each Advocate General/counsel for the Slate/UT which has any reservation about this matter, i.e., enlargement of the terms of reference of the Shetty Commission should file the same in writing during the course of the day. In respect of the States/UTs on whose behalf no reservation/ objection is filed today by 4.30 p.m. with a copy to Mr. P. Parmeswaran, advocate on record for the Union of India, it will be assumed that the State/UT concerned has no objection to such enlargement of the terms of reference of the Shetty Commission. The learned Additional, Solicitor General may, therefore, proceed in this matter on the basis of the response so made by the end of the day. ,
2. Shri Nariman, learned amicus curiae has brought to our notice information conveyed to him that there is some practical difficulty which has arisen on account of the spale at which payment of salaries to the Judicial Officers has to be made in view of the recommendations of the Fifth Pay Commission and at some places it is also apprehended that till the final decision is taken by framing the new pay scales and adopting the same, payment-of salary to the Judicial Officers even according to the current pay scales may be deferred. We do hope that no such incongruous situation would be permitted by any of the State/UT Government. The learned Advocate General/counsel for the States/UTs would ensure that such a situation does not arise any place. However, with a view to ensure that even a single Judicial Officer in any State/UT does not suffer on account of any ambignity/vacillation in the mind of any concerned authority, we direct that every State/ UT Government will ensure regular payment to every Judicial Officer at least according to the current pay scales till the new pay scales are framed and adopted or any beneficial order is made as an interim measure by the Shetty Commission.
3. It is also important that the new pay scales are framed and adopted for the Judicial Officers in every State/UT as early as possible on account of the fact that revision of the pay scales of even the supporting staff pursuant to the recommendations of the Fifth Pay Commission has the result not un often of many members of the supporting staff drawing a higher salary according to their new pay scales than their superior Judicial Officers who may be drawing salary according to the current pay scale only. It is imperative that prompt action should be taker by all the concerned authorities to prevent any such anamalous situation..
4. The learned Additional Solicitor General as well as the Advocate General/counsel for the States/UTs assure us that the concerned governments would ensure prompt and full compliance of this order in letter and spirit immediately. The Registry is to send copy of this order to the Chief Secretary of each State/UT and also to Onion Law Secretary, Union Home Secretary and Union Finance Secretary.
5. List on 4th December, 1997.