Back
S. P. BHARUCHA, SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI, U. C. BANERJEE, S. N. VARIAVA, SHIVARAJ V. PATIL
EX-CAPT. Harish Uppal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The suspension of Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya and Ms. Mita Mukherjee, advocates, has been revoked. The interlocutory applications in this regard in Writ Petition (C) No. 821 of 1990 do not survive for consideration and are disposed of as having become infructuous.
2. We are informed that the Supreme Court Bar Association has, by its Resolution dated 18th January, 2002, resolved to revoke the expulsion/suspension of Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Mr. Ram Jethmalani and Kamini Jaiswal.
3. Adjourned for six weeks.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
