ORDER :

Markandey Katju, K. Ganguly, JJ.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The appellant herein is the tenant of the premises in dispute and the respondent is the landlord.

3. The respondent-landlord filed an ejectment petition under Section 13(3)(b) of the Haryana (Urban Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 (hereinafter for short 'the Act') on the ground of bonafide need which was allowed by the Rent Controller vide order dated 3.1.2001. In appeal preferred by the appellant- tenant, the Appellate Authority vide order dated 9.5.2001 set aside the order passed by the Rent Controller holding that there was no bonafide need. Against the said order dated 9.5.2001 of the Appellate Authority, the respondent-landlord filed a revision petition under Section 15(6) of the Act before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh, which has been allowed by the impugned judgment and order. Balwant Singh Chaudhary v. Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd., (2004) 137 PLR 198. Hence, the appellant-tenant is before us by way of the present appeal by special leave.

4. It has been submitted by Mr. Sudhir Chandra, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant that under Section 15(6) of the Ac