SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 394

M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, R. S. PATHAK, S. NATARAJAN
Ram Das – Appellant
Versus
Ishwar Chander – Respondent


Advocates:
BALMOKAND GOYAL, HARBANS LAL BAJAJ, K.R.NAGARAJA, V.C.MAHAJAN

Judgment

VENKATACHALIAH, J. :- This appeal, by Special Leave, by the tenant arises out of the proceedings for eviction instituted against him under the East Punjab Rent Restriction Act 1949 and is preferred against the judgment, dated, 29-5-1984 in Civil Revn. No. 1934 of 1982* of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, reversing the judgment, dated, 30-4-1982 made by the Appellate Authority, Kapurthala, in Rent Appeal No. 130 and restoring that of the Rent Controller, dated, 17-12-1978 in rent case No. 47 of 1977, granting possession to the Respondent-landlords.

* Reported in (1984) 2 Rent. LR 96 (Punj & Har)

2. Appellant was a tenant of the premises concerned in the proceedings on a monthly rent of Rs. 3 having been inducted into possession on 9-12-1965 by the then owner Smt. Manohar Kaur. The premises in the occupation of the appellant consist of a portion of the groundfloor of the building. On 15-2-1976, the said Manohar Kaur sold the entire property in favour of respondents. The respondents are four brothers. Prior to the purchase, they were occupying, as tenants, other portions of the same building both in the first floor and the second floor. They were in occupation of three rooms i

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top