Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.H. KAPADIA, CJI., B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, K.S. RADHAKRISHANA, SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.
Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Ch. Prabhakar – Respondent
C.A. No. 6131 of 2002
Decided On : 29-09-2010
JUDGMENT :
1. In view of the subsequent legislation, we need not answer the reference made to namely, Electricity Act, 2003, learned counsel the Constitution Bench. Consequently, nothing appearing on behalf of the parties say that the survives in this appeal and the same is matter has become academic. Accordingly, accordingly dismissed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
