1. Assessment order set aside by High Court for lack of cross-examination opportunity — Appeal to Supreme Court. (Para 2 )
Back
Next 
2010 Supreme(SC) 1463
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.H. KAPADIA, CJI., K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN, SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.
Income Tax Officer – Appellant
Versus
M. Pirai Choodi – Respondent
Civil Appeal Nos. 9756-9757 of 2010, S.L.P. (C) Nos. 1736-1737 of 2009
Decided On : 19-11-2010
An assessment order should not be quashed entirely for denial of cross-examination if the authority can be directed to grant such opportunity, especially when the assessee has failed to exhaust available statutory remedies.
Headnote:(A) Taxation - Assessment Proceedings - Denial of opportunity to cross-examine witness - Quashing of entire assessment order - The appellate court should not have set aside the entire assessment order on the ground that no opportunity for cross-examination was granted; the appropriate course of action would have been to direct the assessing officer to grant such an opportunity. (Para 2)
(B) Statutory Remedy - Failure to avail - Where a statutory remedy of appeal is available, the court should not quash the assessment proceedings, particularly when the party has failed to avail themselves of said statutory remedy. (Para 2)
Facts of the case:
An assessment order was set aside by the High Court because the assessee was not granted an opportunity to cross-examine a witness as requested.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the High Court erred in quashing the entire assessment proceeding rather than directing the assessing officer to provide the opportunity for cross-examination. Furthermore, it was observed that the assessee had failed to exhaust the available statutory remedy of appeal.
Issues: Whether the High Court was justified in quashing the entire assessment order due to the denial of an opportunity for cross-examination when a statutory remedy was available.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment order should not be quashed in its entirety for a procedural lapse that can be remedied by a specific direction to the assessing officer, especially when the affected party has failed to exercise a statutory right of appeal.
Result: Impugned order set aside.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. High Court should not have quashed assessment; assessee could have appealed to CIT (Appeals). (Para 2 )
3. For denial of cross-examination, court should direct opportunity to cross-examine, not set aside assessment. Statutory remedies must be exhausted. (Para 2 )
4. Impugned order set aside; assessee granted liberty to move CIT (Appeals) within six weeks. (Para 3 , 4 )
5. Should a court set aside an entire assessment order for failure to grant cross-examination?
No, the court should direct the assessing officer to grant cross-examination opportunity instead of quashing the entire order. (Para 2 )
6. Must an assessee exhaust statutory remedies before seeking High Court intervention?
Yes, the assessee must appeal to CIT (Appeals) before approaching the High Court; failure to do so bars relief. (Para 2 )
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel on both sides. Leave granted.
2. In this case, the High Court has set aside the order of assessment on the ground that no opportunity to cross-examine was granted, as sought by the assessee. We are of the view that the High Court should not have set aside the entire Assessment Order. At the highest, the High Court should have directed the Assessing Officer to grant an opportunity to the assessee to cross-examine the concerned witness. Be that as it may, we are of the view that, even on this particular aspect, the assessee could have gone in appeal to CIT (Appeals). The assessee has failed to avail the statutory remedy. In the circumstances, we are of the view that the High Court should not have quashed the assessment proceedings vide impugned order.
3. Consequently, the impugned order is set aside. Liberty is granted to the assessee to move CIT (Appeals). It is made clear that the assessee herein will move the CIT (Appeals) within a period of six weeks from today.
4. Accordingly, these civil appeals stand disposed of.
