SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 1422

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.H. KAPADIA, CJI., AFTAB ALAM, SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.
Government of Andhra Pradesh and others - Petitioner
Versus
Obulapuram Mining Company Private Limited and others - Respondent
SLPs (C) Nos. 7366-67 of 2010 with Nos. 32690-91 of 2010, etc.
Decided on : 29-07-2011

The court held that the precautionary principle, as an essence of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution, justifies the immediate suspension of mining operations to prevent further environmental damage caused by overexploitation.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 21 - Precautionary Principle - Environmental protection - Overexploitation of minerals leading to significant damage - Mining operations and transportation in the specified area suspended till further orders - Precautionary principle treated as the essence of the right to life. (Para 2)

Facts of the case:
Mining operations in a specific area had caused significant environmental damage due to overexploitation. The court addressed the environmental impact and the necessity of suspending these activities to prevent further degradation.

Findings of Court:
The court found that overexploitation resulted in considerable damage to the environment and determined that a holistic approach was required to protect the ecological balance, necessitating the immediate suspension of mining and transportation.

Issues: Whether the suspension of mining and transportation operations is necessary to prevent further environmental degradation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that since the precautionary principle is an essence of the right to life under the Constitution, it justifies the immediate suspension of operations when significant environmental damage is evident.

Result: Mining operations and transportation suspended till further orders.

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • constitutional law
    • right to life
      • precautionary principle (Para 2)
  • environmental law
    • environmental damage (Para 2)
    • mining operations (Para 1, 4, 5)
    • environmental impact assessment (Para 5)
  • practice and procedure
    • interim orders (Para 1, 3, 4, 5, 6)
    • directions to government (Para 4, 5)

Table of Contents

1. Mining operations suspended due to overexploitation causing environmental damage — Precautionary principle under Article 21 invoked. (Para 1 , 2 )

2. Overexploitation caused considerable environmental damage — Precautionary principle under Article 21 applied. (Para 2 )

3. Precautionary principle, being essence of Article 21, justifies immediate suspension to prevent environmental harm. (Para 2 )

4. Mining operations and transportation in Bellary District suspended immediately; MoEF and CEC directed to submit reports. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 )

5. What legal principle justifies the immediate suspension of mining operations for environmental protection?

The precautionary principle, as an essential part of Article 21 of the Constitution, allows the court to suspend operations to prevent further environmental damage. (Para 1 , 2 )

ORDER :

S.H. Kapadia, CJI., Aftab Alam and Swatanter Kumar, JJ.

In continuation of our earlier orders dated 29-4-2011, Govt. of A.P. v. Odulapuram Mining Co. Ltd. , 2011 (12) SCC 495 and 6-5-2011, Govt. of A.P. v. Odulapuram Mining Co. Ltd. , 2011 (12) SCC 493 we are of the view that mining operations and transportation in an area and measuring approximately 10,868 ha in Bellary District be immediately suspended till further orders.

2. We are satisfied that, on account of overexploitation, considerable damage has been done to the environment. We are taking a holistic view of the matter. We have suspended these operations keeping in mind the precautionary principle, which is the essence of Article 21 of the Constitution. (See M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, 2009 6 SCC 142)

3. The matter shall stand over for one week.

4. In the meantime, we direct the Ministry of Environment and Forests ("MoEF", for short) to submit an interim report indicating what is the requirement of steel industry in India as far as iron ore is concerned. Secondly, out of the total requirement of the steel industry in the country, how much is met by the Bellary mines. Lastly, how much of the quantity of iron ore is domestically required and internationally exported. MoEF will obtain this requisite information from the Ministries of Mines, Steel and Commerce.

5. The Secretary, MoEF, will immediately convene a meeting of the Secretaries of the Ministries concerned and furnish a report within a week. We further direct CEC to submit a report on environment impact assessment on account of mining in Tumkur and Chitradurga Districts within a period of three weeks.

6. The affidavits filed by the parties are taken on record.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top