R.V.RAVEENDRAN, H.L.GOKHALE
Manohar Joshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
H.L. Gokhale, J.
What is the nature and significance of the planning process for a large Municipal town area? In that process, what is the role of the Municipal Corporation, which is the statutory planning authority? Can the State Government interfere in its decisions in that behalf and if so, to what extent? Does the State Government have the power to issue instructions to the Municipal Corporation to act in a particular manner contrary to the Development Plan sanctioned by the State Government, and that too a number of years after the Municipal Corporation having taken the necessary steps in consonance with the plan? Can the State Government instruct a Municipal Corporation to shift the reservation for a public amenity such as a primary school on a plot of land, and also instruct it to grant a development permission for residential purposes thereon without modifying the Development Plan? Could it still be considered as an action following the due process of law merely because a provision of Development Control Rules is relied upon, whether it is applicable or not? Or where the Municipal Corporation is required to take such contrary steps, supposedly on the instructions o
Jasbir Singh Chhabra v. State of Punjab 2010 (4) SCC 192.
Laxmi Narayan Bhattad v. State of Maharashtra [2003 (5) SCC 413].
M.I Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu and Ors. 1999 (6) SCC 464.
Mangal Oram v. State of Orissa 1977 (2) SCC 46.
Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner
P.K. Dave v. Peoples' Union of Civil Liberties (Delhi) and Ors. 1996 (4) SCC 262.
PR Naidu v. Government of Andhra Pradesh AIR 1977 SC 854) = [1977 (3) SCC 160].
Pratibha Cooperative Housing Society v. State of Maharashtra 1991 (3) SCC 341.
Raju S. Jethmalani v. State of Maharashtra [2005 (11) SCC 222].
Registered Society v. Union of India 1999 (6) SCC 667.
Reserve Bank of India v. Peerless Corpn. [AIR 1987 SC 1023 = 1987 (1) SCC 424].
Santu Kisan Khandwe v. Special Land Acquisition Officer No. 2 Nasik and Ors. 1995 (1) Mh.LJ 363.
Shivajirao Nilangekar Patil v. Dr. Mahesh Madhav Gosavi [1987 (1) SCC 227].
Special Land Acquisition Bombay v. M/s Godrej and Boyce AIR 1987 SC 2421.
State of Bihar v. Dhirendra Kumar and Ors. 1995 (4) SCC 229.
State of Maharashtra v. Mahadeo Deoman Rai 1990 (3) SCC 579.
State of U.P. v. Mohammad Naim [AIR 1964 SC 703].
Tarlochan Das v. State of Punjab and Ors. 2001 (6) SCC 260.
Union of India v. Jaswant Rai Kochhar 1996 (3) SCC 491.
Vikas Prodhikaran v. Pure Industrial Coke and Chemicals Ltd. and Ors. 2007 (8) SCC 705.
VL and Co. v. Bennett Coloman and Co. [AIR 1977 SCC 1884] = [1977 (1) SCC 561].
Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India [AIR 1984 SC 802].
Bangalore Medical Trust v. B.S. Muddapa [1991 (4) SCC 54].
Collector of 24 Parganas v. Lalit Mohan Mullick 1986 (2) SCC 138.
E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu [AIR 1974 SC 555].
Ghulam Mustafa v. State of Maharashtra 1976 (1) SCC 800.
Girnar Traders (3) v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2011 (3) SCC 1.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.