SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 1442

S. H. KAPADIA, K. S. P. RADHAKRISHNAN, SWATANTER KUMAR
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-III – Appellant
Versus
Surya Herbal Limited – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Goolam E. Vahanvati, Attorney General (Rupesh Kumar, Anand Kannan and B.V. Balaram Das, Advocates.

ORDER :

S.H. Kapadia, CJI., K.S.P. Radhakrishnan, Swatanter Kumar, JJ.

Delay condoned.

2. Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated 9th February, 2011, should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income Tax Act, 1961, in which a common principle may be involved in subsequent group of matters or large number of matters. In our view, in such cases if attention of the High Court is drawn, the High Court will not apply the Circular ipso facto. For that purpose, liberty is granted to the Department to move the High Court in two weeks.

3. The special leave petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top