Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.M. Lodha, CJI., Madan B. Lokur, Kurian Joseph, JJ.
Manohar Lal Sharma - Petitioner
Versus
Principle Secretary - Respondent
W.P. (Crl.) No(s). 120 of 2012 with W.P. (C) No. 463 of 2012, W.P. (C) No. 515 and 45 of 2012, W.P. (C) No. 283 of 2013
Decided On : 01-09-2014
JUDGMENT :
1. In light of paragraph 157 of our judgment of August 25, 2014, Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned Attorney General, Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel for Coal Producers Association and Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, learned senior counsel for Sponge Iron Manufacturers Association made their submissions. They and also learned senior counsel for the Independent Power Producers Association of India prayed for some time to file respective affidavits.
2. Their prayer is reasonable. The affidavits may be filed by the Union of India and the above three Associations by September 8, 2014.
3. List the matters on September 9, 2014 at 10.30 A.M.
4. A report dated 01.09.2014 has been submitted by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). It is stated that Shri R.S. Cheema has been appointed as Special Public Prosecutor by the Government of India vide notification dated 27.08.2014 in cases pertaining to allocation of coal blocks as per this Court's order dated 25.07.2014. It is also stated in the report that Shri R.S. Cheema has now requested for attachment of three Senior Public Prosecutors, namely, (1) Shri A.P. Singh, Senior Public Prosecutor, ACB CBI, Guwahati, (2) Shri Sanjay Kumar, Senior Public Prosecutor, Special Crime-1, CBI Headquarter, New Delhi and (3) Shri V.K. Sharma, Senior Public Prosecutor, ACB, CBI, Delhi to assist him in cases pertaining to allocation of coal blocks.
5. We are satisfied that the request made by Special Public Prosecutor, Shri R.S. Cheema is reasonable and may be accepted. We order accordingly. We direct that the above three Senior Public Prosecutors working with CBI shall assist Shri R.S. Cheema, Special Public Prosecutor.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
