SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1524

A. M. AHMADI, S. C. SEN
Jagir Singh/Sukhvir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. Pursuant to our order dated 23rd January, 1995 the relevant inquiry papers have been placed for perusal and the charge- sheet filed by the State against 41 persons is also appended to the affidavit of Sh. Rajesh Kumar Shrivastava, the Superintendent of Police, Crime Branch CID UP Headquarters, Lucknow. Mr. Sodhi, learned counsel for the petitioners has satisfied himself that the investigation was carried out in a proper manner and he only hopes that the matter will be persuade with the same zeal at the trial. We are sure that the Presiding Judge before whom the trial will be conducted will ensure that any effort to keep back the material from the Court to interfere with evidence would be thwarted.

2. Since the legal representatives of the deceased have already been paid ex-gratia payment of Rs. one lac per person, and the injured have been sanctioned Rs. 20,000/- each nothing further remains to be done so far as that aspect of the matter is concerned.

3. Mr. Parekh learned Advocate had some doubts as to whether the injured persons were merely sanctioned the amount or were actually paid. That could be ascertained, if Mr. Parekh, so desires, by visiting the jail and meetin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top