SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1598

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.S. Anand, CJI., M. Srinivasan, N. Santosh Hegde, JJ.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-II - Appellant
Versus
Time Pharma - Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 3562 of 1998 (From the order dated 21-1-1997 of CEGAT (Mumbai) in Time Pharma v. CCE, (1998) 99 ELT 643 (Tribunal).
Decided On : 22-2-1999

ORDER :

Dr.A.S.ANAND, CJI. and M. Srinivasan and N. Santosh Hegde, JJ. - There is an inordinate delay of 360 days in filing this appeal. In the application seeking condonation of delay, there is no explanation, whatsoever, of delay which occurred after 18-5-1997 till 5-6-1998, when the appeal was filed. The affidavit is singularly silent in that regard.

2. In the absence of any explanation, much less a satisfactory or reasonable explanation, it is not possible to accept the application seeking condonation of delay.

3. The application seeking condonation of delay is rejected. Consequently, this appeal shall stand dismissed as barred by time.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top