SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, CJI., P. SATHASIVAM, J.M. PANCHAL, JJ.
Monika Ranka and others - Appellants
Versus
Medical Council of India and others - Respondent
Civil Appeals Nos. 5518 to 5521 of 2008
Decided on : 04-09-2008
Admission - College/Institute - Application for impleadment - Appellants in these appeals are admitted into year M.B.B.S. Course in Medical College Ujjain - Appellants have joined said course and have appeared for year M.B.B.S. Course examination - Meanwhile Medical Council of India has sought information from college regarding eligibility of students admitted to this course and it was found that about students who had scored and above marks in examination had not secured marks in entrance examination conducted by Association of Private Dental and Medical Colleges of Madhya Pradesh - Appellants herein contended that they were under impression that they had acquired requisite marks and marks secured by them in entrance examination were not made known to them at time of admission and therefore they are not to be blamed for irregular admission if any had taken place - Held, Court maintain judgment of High Court as regards principle laid down but Court direct that these appellants may be allowed to continue their M.B.B.S Course as a special case and their results of year M.B.B.S Course may also be declared so that they may continue with their studies - Management of Medical college was not justified in giving admission to these students - Certainly they must be aware of fact that candidates should have secured at least marks in entrance examination but learned senior counsel appearing for college says that they were not aware of marks secured by these candidates as entrance examination was by a different association as marks were not furnished to them by association - However as admission is found to be irregular equal number of students shall be reduced from management quota for year - Appeals Disposed of
ORDER :
K.G. Balakrishnan, C.J.I
No orders on the application for impleadment and deletion of the name of respondent. Exemption from filing O.T. is allowed. Leave granted.
2. The appellants in these appeals are admitted into the 1st year M.B.B.S.Course in 2006-2007 in R.D.Gardi Medical College, Ujjain. The appellants have joined the said course and have appeared for the 1st year M.B.B.S.Course examination. Meanwhile, the Medical Council of India has sought information from the college regarding the eligibility of the students admitted to this course and it was found that about 20 students who had scored 50% and above marks in the 10+2 examination had not secured 50% marks in the entrance examination conducted by the Association of Private Dental and Medical Colleges of Madhya Pradesh.
3. The appellants herein contended that they were under the impression that they had acquired the requisite marks and the marks secured by them in the entrance examination were not made known to them at the time of admission and, therefore, they are not to be blamed for the irregular admission, if any, had taken place. The High Court considered this aspect and held that the admission of these students was illegal and irregular and their studies were directed to be terminated. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeals were filed.
4. Heard learned senior counsel for the appellants and learned Additional Solicitor General for Medical Council of India.
5. In the Regulation published it was stated that the candidates should have secured more than 50% marks in the entrance examination. There is nothing on record to show that these appellants were informed of the marks secured by them in the entrance examination. As these appellants have already completed one year of their course, equities are in favour of the appellants. But however, we maintain the judgment of the High Court, as regards the principle laid down, but we direct that these appellants may be allowed to continue their M.B.B.S.Course as a special case and their results of the 1st year M.B.B.S.Course may also be declared so that they may continue with their studies.
6. The management of the R.D.Gardi Medical college was not justified in giving admission to these students. Certainly, they must be aware of the fact that the candidates should have secured at least 50% marks in the entrance examination but the learned senior counsel appearing for the college says that they were not aware of the marks secured by these candidates as the entrance examination was held by a different association as the marks were not furnished to them by the association. However, as the admission is found to be irregular, equal number of students shall be reduced from the management quota for the year 2009-10.
7. The appeals are disposed of accordingly. No costs.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.