SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, CJI., P. SATHASIVAM, J.M. PANCHAL, JJ.
All India Judges Association And Others - Petitioners
Versus
Union Of India And Others - Respondents
IA No. 1 in IAs Nos. 157, 193, 194 with IAs Nos. 201 with IA No. 1, IA No. 208 with IAs Nos. 217 with IAs Nos. 219 with IAs Nos. 220 with IA No. 221 with IA No. 222, IA No. 3 in IAs Nos. 152, 223-24, 227-29 with IAs Nos. 230 with IA No. and IA No. 1 in IA No. 213 in WP (C) No. 1022 of 1989, etc
Decided on : 09-09-2008
Recommendations of the Shetty Commission regarding bifurcation between the Executive and the Judiciary - It is for the High Court to pursue the matter and give an appropriate direction to the authorities within a reasonable time and to see that the bifurcation is granted and also to inform that the recommendations of the Shetty Commission are fully complied with. If any recommendations of the Shetty Commission are not complied with fully, such matters shall be reported by the High Court within eight weeks. Thereafter the respective State may consider the same and submit its compliance within eight weeks – Held, It is noticed that sumptuary allowance had been paid only from 3-5-2006. The officers are to be paid the arrears of sumptuary allowance from 1-11-1999. Regarding the medical facilities, a notification has been issued by the Government extending the facilities as are available to the MLAs. The State and the High Court are directed to file a revised status report on or before 18-11-2008. Meanwhile the High Court to pursue the other matters which are not so far extended such as non-release of incentive increments for higher academic qualifications for judicial officers and also the direction to confer power on the District and Sessions Judges to process medical bills of the serving and retired judicial officers.
ORDER :
K.G. Balakrishnan, C.J.I.
Assam
Pursuant to the directions of this Court, the High Court of Assam and the State Government of Assam have filed a statement wherein we find that some of the Shetty Commission recommendations, which had been approved by this Court, are not fully implemented by the State of Assam. It is submitted that the orders have already been passed in respect of pool car facilities to Tehsil/Sub-Divisional Officers. But in cases where there are less than four officers at Tehsil/Sub-Division level, they may be provided with reasonable conveyance allowance.
2. We also notice, besides the above, some other facilities are also not extended to the officers like medical facilities on the ground that no medical facilities are extended to the Members of the Legislature. Even if the Members of the Legislature are not extended with the medical facilities, the judicial officers should be given medical facilities. Further status report be filed within eight weeks extending other facilities such as rent-free housing, transfer of grant, home library and furnishing of drawing rooms, revised pension and LTC/HTC complying with the directions of this Court.
3. In the States of Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura the recommendations of the Shetty Commission are not being fully complied with.
4. The States of Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland have not complied with the recommendations of the Shetty Commission regarding bifurcation between the Executive and the Judiciary, though this bifurcation had already taken place fully in the States of Meghalaya, Tripura and Manipur. We have already passed orders for the bifurcation of the Executive from the Judiciary and also to recruit the judicial officers. We are told that necessary orders have already been passed by the appropriate rule-making authority. It is stated that no further steps have been taken. It is for the High Court to pursue the matter and give an appropriate direction to the authorities within a reasonable time and to see that the bifurcation is granted and also to inform that the recommendations of the Shetty Commission are fully complied with. If any recommendations of the Shetty Commission are not complied with fully, such matters shall be reported by the High Court within eight weeks. Thereafter the respective State may consider the same and submit its compliance within eight weeks.
5. In respect of the State of Mizoram, the State has filed its compliance report but from the compliance report, we see that the revision of pay scales and the Assured Career Progression had been given effect to not from the date recommended by the Shetty Commission but from different dates. We issue the following directions:
1. Pay scales, DA and ACP (Assured Career Progression) scales be released w.e.f. 1-7-1996. Arrears be paid between 1-7-1996 to 2006.
2. Allowances/perks be released from 1-11-1999.
3. Medical facilities be notified as per Shetty Commission recommendations.
4. Telephone facilities be provided, as per Shetty Commission recommendations.
5. Newspaper be given as per Shetty Commission recommendations.
6. Independent vehiclefull compliance be done.
7. Pool car be provided.
8. Tax free leave encashment, etc. be given as per Shetty Commission recommendations.
9. Order regarding pensioners and past pensioners be passed.
6. These matters are to be pursued by the High Court and see that the State shall implement these recommendations. The State of Mizoram to file a fresh affidavit within a period of eight weeks.
7. In respect of Meghalaya, the following directions are issued:
1. DA be notified at Central rates.
2. Compulsory insurance scheme be given.
3. Home library be provided.
4. Courtrooms should be furnished and books be provided in court and residence.
5. Pool car be extended up to Tehsil level.
6. Telephone facility be provided as per Shetty Commission recommendations.
7. Special pay be granted.
8. ACP be granted as per Shetty Commission recommendations.
All India Judges' Assn. (3) v. Union of India (2002) 4 SCC 247
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.