1. Court-appointed Committee to take possession of properties of a company to sell and disburse funds to investors. (Para 1 , 2 )
Back
Next 
2008 Supreme(SC) 2048
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, CJI., P. SATHASIVAM, J.M. PANCHAL, JJ.
The Securities & Exchange Bd. of India - Petitioner
Versus
The Golden Forests (I) Ltd - Respondent
I.A. Nos. 60-83, 85-90 & I.A. No. 91-92 & 93 in T.C.(C) No 2 of 2004, I.A. Nos. 27, 29-38 in T.C.(C) No. 68 of 2003, Compt.P.(C) No. 74 of 2007 in T.C.(C) No. 2 of 2004, T.C.(C) No. 1 of 2004, W.P.(C) No. 188 of 2004.
Decided on : 15-10-2008
The court established a transparent procedure for the sale of assets by a judicial committee to reimburse investors, requiring public notification, professional valuation, an upset price, a 20% deposit by purchasers, and final court confirmation.
Headnote:(A) Securities Law - Recovery of investor funds - Disposal of immovable properties - Procedure for sale by Court-appointed committee - Requirements of public notice, professional valuation, and upset price - Deposit of earnest money - Necessity of judicial confirmation (Paras 2, 3)
Facts of the case:
A list of immovable properties owned by a company and its group was identified for the purpose of recovering funds invested by various investors. A committee consisting of retired judicial officers was appointed to take possession of these properties to facilitate the disbursement of dues to the investors.
Findings of Court:
The committee is authorized to take possession of all properties owned by the respondents and address valid third-party claims subject to court confirmation. The sale of properties must involve wide publication in local newspapers in the area where the property is situated. Sales must be based on valuation by the committee or an approved valuer, with an upset price fixed prior to the sale. The final sale remains subject to court confirmation. Prospective purchasers are required to deposit 20% of the amount in a nationalized bank account maintained by the committee.
Issues: The primary issues concerned the procedural framework for the sale of properties by a court-appointed committee to ensure transparency and the method for handling pending claims and third-party interests.
Ratio Decidendi: To ensure the fair and transparent recovery of funds for investors, the sale of assets by a court-appointed committee must be conducted via public auction based on professional valuation, requiring a significant earnest money deposit and remaining subject to judicial confirmation.
Result: Order passed authorizing the committee to proceed with the sale and processing of claims.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Committee authorized to take property possession and handle valid third-party claims subject to court confirmation. (Para 2 )
3. A court-appointed committee can manage property sale and disbursement, subject to court confirmation and valuation. (Para 3 )
4. Committee to proceed with property sales, investor claims, and report to court; case listed for March 2009. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 )
5. How should a court-appointed committee sell properties to pay investors?
The committee must publish notice, obtain valuation, fix an upset price, and have the sale confirmed by the court. (Para 3 )
6. What happens if third parties claim ownership of properties held by the committee?
The committee may consider valid third-party claims and pass orders, subject to confirmation by the court. (Para 2 )
7. What procedures apply to finalizing a property sale conducted by the committee?
The successful bidder must deposit 20% of the purchase price in a nationalized bank account maintained by the committee. (Para 3 )
ORDER :
1. Dr. Namavati has filed the list of immovable properties owned and possessed by the Golden Forests (I) Ltd. and its group of companies. These properties were allegedly purchased by Golden Forest (I) Ltd. and other group of companies. It is said that the title deeds vest with these respondents.
2. It is stated that huge amount were invested in these companies. A Committee had been appointed by this Court on 19.8.2004, consisting of retired Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court and two District Judges. The said Committee had taken possession of substantial properties owned by the respondents. In order to facilitate the disbursement due to the investors, the money has to be collected by selling these properties. The Committee is authorised to take possession of all the properties owned by the respondents. If there are any valid claims in respect of any of these properties by third parties, the Committee may consider the same and pass appropriate orders, subject to confirmation by this Court.
3. As regards the sale of properties is concerned, the Committee may make appropriate publication regarding the sale and sufficient notice be issued to the prospective purchasers by publishing the same in the local newspaper having wide circulation in the are where the property is situated. Any sale conducted by the Committee shall be based on valuation made by either by the Committee or by other approved valuer and upset price is fixed before sale is finalized. The sale is, however, subject to the confirmation by this Court. As soon as the sale is over, the details including the purchase price and all the details shall be made over to this Court for the purpose of confirmation. As soon as the bid is over the applicant/the prospective purchaser shall deposit 20% of the amount in a nationalised bank in the account maintained by the Committee. If there is any property owned by the respondents, the matter shall be reported to this Court and/or the Committee can also itself request for police aid or any other assistance from the governmental authorities. On all the pending applications, the Committee shall pass appropriate orders subject to confirmation by this Court.
4. As regard the pending claim of the petitioners/applicants the committee may pass appropriate orders and a gist of these orders be made available to this Court for further orders.
5. List in the month of March, 2009.
