Back
P. N. BHAGWATI, G. L. OZA
Champion Electrical – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This appeal raises the same questions as Civil Appeal No. 1496 of 1977 which we have just disposed of by Judgment. Therefore, for the same reasons which have weighed with us in allowing Civil Appeal No. 1496/77, we allow the present appeal and set aside the order of the Government of India in revision and quash the demand for differential duty made by the Assistant Collector and the Collector. If any amount has been recovered by the respondents in respect of differential duty, such amount shall be refunded by the respondent to the appellants within six weeks from today. There will be no order as to costs. Civil Appeals No. 1294 & 1295 of 1977 will also stand disposed of in the same terms.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
