Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
V.N. Khare, CJI., S.B. Sinha, J.
Rajeev Sethi and Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
Archaeological Survey of India & Ors. - Respondents
I.A. No. 3 in W.P. (C) No. 483 of 2003.
Decided On : 21-11-2003
JUDGMENT :
Seeing the facts and circumstances of the case, we appoint Shri Harish N. Salve, learned senior counsel as Amicus Curiae, who will visit the Red Fort along with the learned Solicitor General Shri K.N. Raval and Shri Kapil Sibal, learned senior counsel, on a date and time agreed between them and submit his report to the Court.
2. List after the report is received.
Order accordingly.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
