S. A. BOBDE, A. S. BOPANNA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
SURESH SHAH – Appellant
Versus
HIPAD TECHNOLOGY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.S. Bopanna, J.
1. The petitioner has instituted this petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘Act, 1996’ for short) seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for resolving the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Sub-Lease deed dated 14.11.2018.
2. The property bearing No.154B, Block ‘A’ Sector 63, Phase-III, NOIDA, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P. having been initially allotted and leased by New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (‘NOIDA’ for short) under a Lease dated 26.03.2003 had changed hands and the lease was ultimately transferred in favour of the petitioner under a Transfer Memorandum dated 13.04.2011.
3. The petitioner thus having acquired absolute long-term leasehold right of the land and building referred supra has Sub-Leased the same to the respondent under the Sub-Lease Deed dated 14.11.2018. In respect of the Sub-Lease entered into between the parties, certain disputes are stated to have arisen which is to be resolved. Since the Sub-Lease Deed provides for resolution of the disputes through arbitration vide Clause 12 thereof the petitioner invoked the same by issuing a notice dated 11.12.2019, nominat
Booz Allen and Hamilton Inc vs. SBI Home Finance Limited and Others
Himangni Enterprises vs. Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia
Natraj Studios (P) Ltd. vs. Navrang Studios (1981) 1 SCC 523 – Referred [Para 10]
Vidya Drolia & Ors. vs. Durga Trading Corporation (2019) SCC online SC 358 – Referred [Para 11]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.