ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, B.R.GAVAI
SECUNDERABAD CANTONMENT BOARD – Appellant
Versus
B. RAMACHANDRAIAH – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.F. NARIMAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals arise out of applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ["Arbitration Act"]. On 02.09.2000, the appellant before us, Secunderabad Cantonment Board ["Appellant"], floated a notice inviting tender ["N.I.T."] for an annual term contract for:
1. Repairs to Main Roads (Resurfacing with Centralised with Hot Mix Plant and Paver);
2. Repairs to Main Roads (Widening of Roads with Centralised Hot Mix Plant and Paver);
3. Repairs to Internal Roads (Resurfacing with Hot Mix Paver and Plant).
3. Pursuant to the aforesaid N.I.T., three agreements were entered into with the respondent, M/s Ramachandraiah and Sons ["Respondent"], the first one dated 23.09.2000 and the other two dated 17.09.2001. Clause 5 of each of the aforesaid agreements, which is in identical terms, is important and reads as follows:
"5. Final Bill: The Contractor shall submit his final bil of the work with full and complete measurements showing the deductions on account of part payments received and stores supplied by the Board cost of water and any other items received by him under the contract within 08 days from the date of completi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.