Back
R. M. LODHA, MADAN B. LOKUR, KURIAN JOSEPH
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
INTERNATIONAL SINDHI PANCHAYATS – Respondent
ORDER
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6079 OF 2010:
1. We have heard Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, learned senior counsel for the appellant, Mr. Yashpal Dhingra, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, Mr. Arvind Savant, learned senior counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 to 5, Mr. Shankar Chillarge, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 6 to 8 and Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, learned senior counsel for the respondent No. 9.
2. As against respondent Nos. 6 & 8, it is ordered as follows:
It is declared that the provisions of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act are applicable to the Displaced Persons Claims and Other Laws Repeal Act, 2005 (for short "Repeal Act, 2005") and that the respondent Nos. 6 and 8 herein shall continue to decide the cases and
proceedings pending on the date of the said Repeal Act, 2005 and implement the decisions in the said cases under the unrepealed Displaced Persons Compensation & Rehabilitation Act, 1954 and other related Acts.
2. Civil Appeal is disposed of as above. The above order also disposes of Public Interest Litigation No. 52 of 2006 pending before the Bombay High Court. No costs.
Leave granted.
2. We are informed that the State of Punjab has enacted the Punjab Package Deal Properties
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
