SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 432

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, M. R. SHAH
SRIHARI HANUMANDAS TOTALA – Appellant
Versus
HEMANT VITHAL KAMAT – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Tarun Gupta, Santosh Pujari, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Kiran Suri, S.J. Amith, Krishna Kumar, Vipin Gupta, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

DR. JUSTICE DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal arises from a judgment dated 18 January 2021 of a Single Judge at the Dharwad Bench of the High Court of Karnataka. The revisional jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (“CPC”) was invoked for challenging an order dated 1st July 2019 of the IInd Additional Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Belgaum on an application1[IA No. VII in OS 138/2008.] under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC.

3. Ms. Leela Vithal Kamat was the title holder of the suit property. On her death on 16 May 1996, the property was mutated in the names of her legal heirs – the first respondent and his brother. The first respondent and his brother took a loan from the Karnataka State Finance Corporation (“KSFC”) and mortgaged the suit property as security for repayment of the loan. Since the loan was not repaid, KSFC auctioned the property. The third respondent, who is the predecessor-in-interest of the appellant, furnished the highest bid of Rs. 15,00,000. A sale deed of the suit property was executed in favour of the third respondent on 8 August 2006. Despite the execution of the


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

No cases in the provided list explicitly indicate that they have been overruled, reversed, or explicitly treated as bad law. The list predominantly references the case of Srihari Hanumandas Totala v. Hemant Vithal Kamat (2021) 9 SCC 99, which appears to be frequently cited and relied upon, suggesting it remains good law and authoritative. There are no phrases such as "overruled," "reversed," "criticized," or "questioned" that directly indicate a case has been invalidated or discredited in subsequent rulings.

Srihari Hanumandas Totala v. Hemant Vithal Kamat (2021) 9 SCC 99 is repeatedly cited and relied upon across multiple entries, often with language indicating reliance or support, e.g., "supports the above view," "reiterated the same principle," "laid down principles," "principles for deciding applications," and "guiding principles." This pattern suggests it remains authoritative and followed in subsequent decisions.

Several entries explicitly mention that the Supreme Court "laid down principles" or "formulated guiding principles" in this case, indicating it is considered a foundational or guiding authority on issues like res judicata, plaint rejection, and procedural principles.

Some entries refer to specific paragraphs or aspects of the case (e.g., paragraph 25), indicating that particular principles from the case are being applied or distinguished for specific legal issues, but without evidence of criticism or overrule.

The case is also cited in relation to procedural principles under Order VII Rule 11 and principles for adjudication, showing it is used as a reference point rather than being questioned or overruled.

A few references mention the case in passing or as part of a list of authorities without elaboration, e.g., "reliance was placed upon" or "the ratio laid down in the said matter is different," but without explicit indication of whether the case's authority is upheld or questioned.

The absence of explicit language indicating overrule or criticism suggests treatment remains supportive or neutral, but the lack of explicit affirmation makes treatment somewhat uncertain.

**Source :** Dhiraj Choudhury S/o Late Debendra Nath Choudhury VS Md. Abdul Samad Akand S/o Late Abdul Karim Akand - Gauhati Putul Bhattacharjee VS Sudarshan Bhattacharjee - Calcutta Municipal Council, Khajuraho VS Brajkishor Agrawal - Madhya Pradesh G. Sankarabushanam VS E. Dhavamani - Supreme Court Krishan Kakkar VS Kiran Chander - Delhi Sugra Beguam VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh B. Fouress Private Limited VS State of A. P. - Gauhati B.Gopinath vs J.Neelavathi - Madras Balaram Das VS Guru Charan Biswas - Calcutta Shri Jainendra Gurukul Panchkula Through Its Secretary VS Dev Raj - Punjab and Haryana Shaun Automobiles Private Limited VS State Bank of India - Calcutta P. Bhoopal, S/o. Late Munipoovanna vs P. Govindappa, S/o. Late Munipoovanna - Karnataka G-Corp Spaces Pvt. Ltd. vs Sumitra Ghosh, S/O Mr.Sunil Kumar Ghosh - Karnataka C. M. Meenakshi VS Archbishop of Bangalore - Supreme Court SRI P. BHOOPAL S/O LATE MUNIPOOVANNA vs SRI. P. GOVINDAPPA S/O LATE MUNIPOOVANNA - Karnataka Alo Rani Sarkar VS Swapan Majumdar - Calcutta Pascoal Jose Vaz VS Arnaldo David Vaz E Sousa - Bombay Yadav Venkatesh VS Modukuru Kiran - Current Civil Cases Pandurangan VS T. Jayarama Chettiar - Supreme Court JAMMA MASJID MALALIPETE vs SRI DHANANJAY - Karnataka Vijay Gupta VS Shashi Jain - Allahabad Bhoopal P. v. P. Govindappa - Karnataka Wilman Associates India Pvt. Ltd. vs Susanta Roy Kayal - Calcutta G. Sathyanarayana Reddy VS Mohd. Thajuddin Ghouri - Telangana MAHESH MANGAL VS SHRIBHAGWAN MANGAL - Madhya Pradesh Joginder Singh VS Harjit Singh - Punjab and Haryana Ishwar VS Bhim Singh - Punjab and Haryana KARODE GRAMA PANCHAYAT vs VIJAYARAJ - Kerala Karim Hotel Pvt Ltd VS Kareem Dhanani - Delhi L. M. Techno-build Private Limited VS Pranati Ghosh - Calcutta KARODE GRAMA PANCHAYAT vs VIJAYARAJ - Kerala D. N. Bhagya VS D. A. Mallikarjuna - Karnataka Kachra S/o Lakshi Bhil VS Ayub S/o Ibrahim Sheikh - Rajasthan Ali Akbar Jafari VS Hiraman Tukaram Khandave - Bombay Pooran Lal vs Saurabh Kumar - Allahabad Kewal Singh VS Chander Shekhar Aggarwal - Punjab and Haryana Gurinder Singh Sethi VS Yadwinder Singh Boparai - Punjab and Haryana KACHRA Vs. AYUB - Rajasthan Shyam Prasad Gupta, S/o. Late Saryu Prasad Gupta VS Shiv Prasad Gupta, S/o. Late Saryu Prasad Gupta - Chhattisgarh Mathuresh Infrapro Pvt Ltd. VS Chudiwala Company - Bombay Usha Rai, W/o. Shri Kamal Singh Rai VS Sanskrit Pathsala Samiti, Pipariya - Madhya Pradesh Vijay Gupta VS Shashi Jain - Allahabad C. S. Ramaswamy VS V. K. Senthil - Supreme Court Satya Ram Baruah S/o Late Suryakanta Baruah VS Pranjal Baruah S/o Late Kabindra Baruah - Gauhati Khanindra Nath Keot VS Sujeet Kumar Choudhury - Gauhati MATHURESH INFRAPRO PVT. LTD vs CHANDIWALA COMPANY AND ORS - Bombay Bijay Kumar Mantri @ Vijay Kumar Mantri S/o Late Bishwambhar Lal Mantri VS Shiv Nandan Mantri S/o Late Mali Ram Mantri - Patna M. Satyanarayana Murthy (Died) By Lrs VS K. Ramalinga Swamy Naidu (Died) By Lrs - Andhra Pradesh Gopi vs Shanthi - Madras Murugaiyan rep. by power of attorney L.Hiriharan vs M.Ramalaingam - Madras Santosh Kumar Sahu, S/o Maujiram Sahu VS Basanti Bai, Wd/o Late Budhram Sahu - Chhattisgarh Pratap Singh Choudhary VS Mahadev - Rajasthan Nimrata Shergill VS Shop Owners Welfare Association - Punjab and Haryana Heraeus Electro-Nite International N.V., Belgium vs G.S. Narayan - Orissa Rajkumar Vishandas VS Rajkumar Vishandas - Rajasthan Petitioner VS Respondent - Madras Nimrata Shergill VS Shop Owners Welfare Association - Punjab and Haryana R. Radha @ Radha Ramalingam VS Madhan Raj - Madras R. Radha @ Radha Ramalingam VS Madhan Raj - Madras P. Devaraj VS Kamalamma - Karnataka Chandan Khandewal VS G. Ramakrishna Reddy - Telangana Saurabh Kalani VS Stressed Asset Stabilisation Fund - Allahabad Sanasam Premchandra Singh vs Ahanthem Shanjoy Singh - Manipur Amalgamated Fuels Limited VS Pradip Kumar Jain - Calcutta Mmurugaiyan Rep. By Power Of Attorney L.hiriharan Vs M.ramalaingam - Madras Bakshish Singh VS Ajay Vir Singh - Current Civil Cases Kantilal Joytaram Patel VS Udaji Kanaji Thakor - Gujarat Dheeraj VS Chetna Goswami - Allahabad Karode Grama Panchayat, Represented By Its Secretary, Kala Rani, D/o. Indira Devi VS Vijayaraj, S/o. Nalla Thambi Nadar - Kerala N.V.Subba Raju vs Thadem Ramulamma Kesari Ramulamma - Telangana Mohd. Naseeruddin Ahmed Khan Died VS Mohd. Muzefferuddin Mahmood Khan - Telangana SKS Ispat and Power Limited vs South Eastern Coalfields Limited - Chhattisgarh Prem Kishore VS Brahm Prakash - Supreme Court Pankaj Aggarwal vs Meenakshi Dubey - Delhi Bashir Mohammed S/o. Sheikh Daud @ Daddu VS Mohammed Saeed S/o Mohammed Saeed - Current Civil Cases Shabana Bano VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad R.Lakshmi Narsimha Rao vs M.Ram Mohan Reddy - Telangana SKS Ispat & Power Limited VS South Eastern Coalfields Limited - Chhattisgarh Sathyanath VS Sarojamani - Supreme Court Kolipaka Sree Vishnu VS Kolipaka Laxmi - Telangana Hayeng Mangfi Son Of Late Tangu Mangfi vs Kompu Dolo, Son of Late Tagung Rebe - Gauhati Rajasthan State Seeds Corporation Limited VS J. K. Agri Genetics Limited - Rajasthan M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited vs A. Anand Prasad - Madras Gulab S/o Dajiba Kantode (Dead) VS Kashinath S/o Raghunath Kantode - Bombay Randhir Singh Khanuja S/o Shri Jaspal Singh Khanuja VS Chetna Malu W/o Shri Sanjay Malu - Chhattisgarh Eldeco Housing and Industries Limited VS Ashok Vidyarthi - Supreme Court Nijam Uddin Choudhury, S/o. Late Ishub Ali Choudhury vs Moon Swarnakar, W/o. Ashok Verma And D/o. Late Bijoy Bahadur Swarnakar - Gauhati Morgan Securities And Credits Pvt. Ltd. VS Bpl Limited - Delhi Bashir Mohammed S/o Sheikh Daud @ Daddu VS Mohammed Saeed S/o Mohammed Saeed - Chhattisgarh Devas Employees Mauritius Pvt. Ltd. VS Antrix Corporation Limited - Delhi Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman at Katra Keshav Dev Khewat No. 255 VS U. P. Sunni Central Waqf Board - Allahabad V. Rajeshwari VS T. C. Saravanabava - Supreme Court Soumitra Kumar Sen VS Shyamal Kumar Sen - Supreme Court Shakti Bhog Food Industries Ltd. VS Central Bank of India - Supreme Court Kamala VS K. T. Eshwara Sa - Supreme Court The Church of Christ Charitable Trust & Educational Charitable Society, represented by its Chairman VS Ponniamman Educational Trust represented by its Chairperson/Managing Trustee - Supreme Court Saleem Bhai VS State Of Maharashtra - Supreme Court

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top