SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 1686

T. S. THAKUR, A. K. SIKRI, R. BANUMATHI
DUMPALA DHARMA RAO, IIND ADDL. METRP. SE. JU – Appellant
Versus
HIGH COURT OF A. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. T. Anamika,Adv. Mr. M.V.K.Moorthy, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Ranjit Kumar, SG, Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. Mr. M. P. Shorawala,Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Mr. T.Suhrakar Reddy, Adv. Mr. T. V. Ratnam,Adv. Mr. M.Sowri Dev, Adv. Mr. Sankara Kaushik, Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. Mr. Sravan Kumar K., Adv. Mr. H.P.Raval, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.Ramaakrishna Reddi, Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv. Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, Adv.

ORDER :

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the writ petitioner has already retired from service, this petition has become infructuous and may be dismissed as such. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Interim order dated 07.07.2014 shall stand vacated.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top