S. A. BOBDE, A. S. BOPANNA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR INDIA – Appellant
Versus
SATISH – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Mr. K. K. Venugopal, learned Attorney General for India, made a mention, bringing to our notice a judgment dated 19.01.2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, in Criminal Appeal No.161/2020 wherein the High Court has apparently acquitted the accused under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012 on the ground that the accused had no sexual intent in committing the offence under POCSO Act because there was no direct physical contact, i.e., skin to skin.
2. Mr. Venugopal, learned Attorney General, submitted that the judgment in question is likely to set a dangerous precedent.
3. In view of what is stated, we permit the learned Attorney General to file an appropriate petition against the said judgment.
4. In the meantime, we stay the acquittal of the accused in Criminal Appeal No.161/2020 in respect of the offence under section 8 of the POCSO Act.
5. Issue notice to the accused and the State of Maharashtra returnable two weeks.
Order accordingly.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.