Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Ranjan Gogoi, CJI., Deepak Gupta, Sanjiv Khanna, JJ.
Zahur Haider Zaidi - Appellants
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation - Respondents
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.605 OF 2019
(Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.) No.2123 of 2018)
Decided on : 05-04-2019
Bail - Criminal Law - The court granted bail to the accused-appellant, considering the period of custody suffered, the likely time for completion of trial, and the possibility of approaching the competent court for cancellation of bail if the accused engages in intimidating or influencing witnesses.
Fact of the Case:
The accused-appellant, facing charges under Section 302, had been in custody for 19 months with little progress in the trial beyond the framing of the charge.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the accused-appellant should be released on bail, considering the period of custody suffered, the likely time for completion of trial, and the possibility of approaching the competent court for cancellation of bail if the accused engages in intimidating or influencing witnesses.
Issues: The issue of whether the accused-appellant is entitled to be released on bail and the subsequent consideration of the transfer of the case after hearing all the accused.
Ratio Decidendi: The court granted bail to the accused-appellant, taking into account the allegations, the period of custody suffered, and the likely time that may be taken for completion of trial. The court also emphasized that the prosecution can approach the competent court for cancellation of bail if the accused engages in intimidating or influencing witnesses.
Final Decision: The accused-appellant was granted bail in connection with FIR No.RC SI 2017 S0009 CBI/SC-I/New Delhi, with the order of the High Court being set aside and the appeal being disposed of to that extent. The matter was listed after two weeks for hearing on the issue of transfer.
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. We would presently consider whether the accused-appellant Zahur Haider Zaidi is entitled to be released on bail. The issue of transfer of case would be considered on a subsequent date after hearing all the accused.
3. Our attention has been drawn to the allegations against the accused-appellant and that he is in custody for the last 19 months. Though the accused-appellant is facing charge under Section 302, we are told that the trial has not made substantial progress beyond the framing of the charge. Completion of trial will take some time.
4. The only apprehension expressed on behalf of the Central Bureau of Investigation is that the appellant being a highly placed police officer may intimidate and win over witnesses and influence them.
5. We are of the view that the bail ought not to be denied on the aforesaid ground and in the event of any such conduct, the prosecution can always approach the competent court for cancellation of bail.
6. Taking into account the allegations, the period of custody suffered and likely time that may be taken for completion of trial, we are of the view that the accused-appellant should be released on bail in connection with FIR No.RC SI 2017 S0009 CBI/SC-I/New Delhi, on satisfaction of the appropriate condition(s) as may be imposed by the learned trial court. The order of the High Court is set aside. The appeal is disposed of to the aforesaid extent.
7. List the matter after two weeks for hearing on the issue of transfer.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
