SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 842

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. A. Bobde, CJI., A. S. Bopanna, V. Ramasubramanian, JJ.
Rakesh Vaishnav & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 1118 of 2020 with W.P.(C) No. 1152,1165, 1168, 1174 of 2020 (PIL-W) and W.P.(C) No. 1404, 1406, 1421 and 1441 of 2020
Decided On : 17-12-2020

Advocates appeared:
Mr. K.Parameshwar, Advocate, Mr. M.V. Mukunda, Advocate, Mr. Sukumar Patthjoshi, Sr. Advocate, Mr. k.K.L. Gautam, Advocate, Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate, Mr. A.K. Suman, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Kumar Singh, Advocate, Mr. Vijendra Kasana, Advocate, Mr. Aditya Agarwal, Advocate, Mr. Sanjeev Malhotra, Advocate, Mr. Vivek K. Tankha,Sr. Advocate, Mr. Varun Tankha, Advocate, Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, Advocate, Mr. Prashant Sivarajan, Advocate, Mr. Ujjawal Anand Sharma, Advocate, Ms. Jhanvi Dubey, Advocate, Ms. Suditi Batra, Advocate, Mr. Hussain Ali, Advocate, Mr. P.Wilson, Sr. Advocate, Mr. D.kumanan, Advocate, Mr. Richardson Wilson, Advocate, Mr. Om Prakash Ajitsinghh Parikhar,Advocate, Mr. Dushyant Tiwari, Advocate, MR. Yudhvir Dalal, Advocate, Mr. Harisha S.R., Advocate, Petitioner-in-Person Mr. Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate, Mr. Harish N. Salve,Sr. Advocate, Mr. Deepak Goel,Advocate, Mr. Kamal Kumar Pandey, Advocate, Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocate, Ms. Madhuri Gupta, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. K.K. Venugopal, AG Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG Ms. Suhasini Sen, Advocate, Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Advocate, Ms. Chinmayee Chandra, Advocate, Mr. Rajat Nair, Advocate, Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, Advocate, Mr. B.V. Balramdas, Advocate, Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Advocate, Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG Mr. Anil Grover, Sr. AAG Ms. Noopur Singhal, Advocate, Mr. Rahul Khurana, Advocate, Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Sanjay Kumar visen,Advocate, for the Respondent; Mr. P. Chidambaram,Sr. Advocate, Mr. Atul Nanda, AG Ms. Uttara Babbar, Advocate, Mr. Rahul Mehra, Advocate Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Advocate Ms. Abhilasha Bharti, Advocate Mr. Ajay Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Gaurav Yadava, Advocate, for the State of Punjab; Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate, for the U.P.; Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate, Mr. V.P. Singh, Advocate, Mr. Sharwan Kumar Goyal, Advocate, Mr. Sadashiv, Advocate, for the Intervener (BKU-Bhanu)

Points Of Law : No impediment in the exercise of such rights as long asit is non-violent and does not result in damage to life and properties of other citizens and is in accordance with law - Farmers' protest should be allowed to continue without impediment and without any breach of peace either by the protesters or the police.

Headnote:

Constitution Of India, 1950 - Petitioners were allowed to serve copies of these petitions upon impleaded farmers' Associations and these matters were directed to be posted today to enable Court to hear farmers who are agitating at Borders of National Capital Region of Delhi. - However, none of impleaded respondents-farmers' assocations have appeared today though petitioners claim to have informed them over their respective mobile/whatsapp numbers - However, Union (Bhanu Group) appeared through Mr. A.P. Singh, leanred counsel.

Finding Of The Court :

Court Consider it appropriate in interests of justice to Constitute a Committee comprising of independent and impartial persons including experts in field of Agriculture for purpose - Court may not be possible without hearing all necessary parties - Till parties come before us, it would be advisable to obtain suggestions about constitution of said Committee from all parties which may be submitted by them on date of next hearing in matter.

Result : Order Accordingly

ORDER

W.P.(C) Nos.1404/2020, 1406/2020, 1421/2020 and 1441/2020

1. While issuing notice to the respondents on 16.12.2020, the petitioners were allowed to serve copies of these petitions upon the impleaded farmers' Associations and these matters were directed to be posted today to enable the Court to hear the farmers who are agitating at the Borders of National Capital Region of Delhi. However, none of the impleaded respondents-farmers' assocations have appeared today though the petitioners claim to have informed them over their respective mobile/whatsapp numbers. However, the Bharatiya Kisan Union (Bhanu Group) appeared through Mr. A.P. Singh, leanred counsel.

2. The preliminary issue before this Court is the claim of the citizens who are the residents of NCT of Delhi/Haryana, having a population of more than two million people, that the manner in which the protest is being carried on is seriously inhibiting the supply of essential goods to the city because of restrictions on the free movement of goods vehicles. According to the petitioners, this will result in a sharp increase in the prices of goods which would be difficult for people to bear in these times of Pandemic.

3. Mr. P. Chidambaram, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Punjab, submits that the State of Punjab welcomes the constitution of the aforesaid committee to resolve the present dispute between the farmers and the Government of India.

4. The contention on behalf of the petiitoners is that no fundamental right is absolute and it would be necessary for the Court to determine the contours of the right of free speech and expression involved in the farmers' protest and the extent to which this right can be exercised consistently with the rights of other citizens.

5. According to the respondents, the roads are blocked by the police in order to prevent the entries of the protesters/farmers to the city of Delhi.

6. We clarify that this Court will not interfere with the protest in question. Indeed the right to protest is part of a fundamental right and can as a matter of fact, be exercised subject to public order. There can certainly be no impediment in the exercise of such rights as long asit is non-violent and does not result in damage to the life and properties of other citizens and is in accordance with law.

7. We are of the view at this stage that the farmers' protest should be allowed to continue without impediment and without any breach of peace either by the protesters or the police.

8. We are informed that the protest is mainly directed against the three laws viz., (1) Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020, (2) Esstential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 2020 and (3) Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act, 2020, enacted by the Parliament recently. The writ petitions challenging the said laws have been filed before this Court and will be decided in due course.

9. In order to bring about an effective solution to the present stalemate between the protesters and the Government of India, we consider it appropriate in the interests of justice to constitute a Committee comprising of independent and impartial persons including experts in the field of Agriculture for the purpose. This may not be possible without hearing all the necessary parties. Till the parties come before us, it would be advisable to obtain suggestions about the constitution of the said Committee from all the parties which may be submitted by them on the date of next hearing in the matter.

10. List these matters after the ensuing winter vacation with liberty to move the Vacation Bench if necessary, after service is complete.

11. In the meantime, the petitioners are given liberty to serve the unserved respondents/ impleaded farmers.

12. The pendency of these matters will not prevent the parties from resolving the issue amicably.

W.P.(C) Nos.1118/2020, 1152/2020, 1174/2020, 1168/2020 & 1165/2020

List these ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top