SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 977

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. Khanwilkar, Sanjiv Khanna, JJ.
Deepak Yadav & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
Union Public Service Commission & Anr. - Respondents
Writ Petition(S)(Civil) No(S). 408 of 2021, Writ Petition (C) NO.571, 717 of 2021
Decided On : 16-07-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Tanya Shree, AOR, Mr. Ritu Raj, Adv., Mr. Haris Beeran, Adv., Mr. Mushtaq Salim, Adv., Mr. Usman ghani Khan, Adv., Mr. Azhar Assees, Adv., Mr. Radha Shyam Jena, AOR
For the Respondent: Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, ASG Ms. Sansriti Pathak, Adv., Ms. Meera Patel, Adv., Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, Adv., Mr. B.V. Balram Das, AOR, Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv., Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, AOR

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 142 - University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Section 3 - Union Public Service Commission - It is an accepted position that petitioners had appeared in third and final year graduation examination conducted by University of Delhi/Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University in August/October, 2020 – Held, Court are dealing with an extraordinary and unparalleled situation because of pandemic and Court deem it appropriate to exercise plenary power under Article 142 of Constitution - Relief and succor are needed and justified to alleviate misfortune of candidates who have qualified and come within consideration zone and merit category - It would be inequitable to deny them an opportunity of participating in selection process because pandemic has caused delay in declaration of their results by concerned University – Court issue direction to UPSC to permit 5 candidates, as a special case, to participate in personality test/interview in respective categories in which they have qualified - Addition of these 5 candidates would not be to disadvantage of any already empanelled candidate in published list for personality test/interview in respective branches/categories - Court also clarify that this order should not be treated as a precedent - Writ Petitions disposed of.

ORDER :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners assail the Letter of Cancellation of their candidature dated 12.03.2021 issued by the respondent-Union Public Service Commission (for short “UPSC”), due to the failure of the petitioners to submit requisite proof of educational qualification on or before 11.11.2020, being the revised last date for submitting of the “Detailed Application Form-I” along with the requisite documents.

3. It is an accepted position that the petitioners had appeared in the third and final year graduation examination conducted by University of Delhi/Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University in August/October, 2020. These examinations, normally conducted in the month of June/July, were delayed on account of the nationwide lockdown and restrictions due to Covid-19 pandemic.

4. In terms of the notification dated 12.02.2020, the petitioners having appeared in the examination the passing of which would have rendered them educationally qualified, were permitted to appear in the preliminary examination conducted on 04.10.2020. In the results of the preliminary examination declared on 23.10.2020, the petitioners, having qualified, were required to fill up the Detailed Application Form-I to appear in the main examination. The last date for submission of the Detailed Application Form-I was 11.11.2020.

5. However, as the third and final year graduation examination results had not been declared, the petitioners while filling up the “Detailed Application Form-I” had submitted that they were bona-fide students of the concerned University of the 2017-2020 batch, and had appeared in the third and final year examination. They had sought opportunity to appear in the main examination with an undertaking that the degree certificate would be furnished as soon as the same is made available.

6. The petitioners had appeared in the main examination which was conducted between 08.01.2021 and 17.01.2021. Meanwhile, in December, 2020 the University of Delhi and in November, 2020, the Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, declared the results of the petitioners. The petitioners, having cleared the third and final year graduation examination, then made attempts to submit the qualifying certificates to the appropriate authority/UPSC which, however, were not taken on record.

7. The UPSC cancelled the candidature of the petitioners for failure to produce the qualifying certificates before 11.11.2020, vide the Letter of Cancellation dated 12.03.2021. The UPSC relies upon clause 7 of the notification dated 12.02.2020, the relevant extract whereof reads thus:

    “7. A candidate must hold a degree of any of the Universities incorporated by an Act of the Central or State legislature in India or other educational institutions established by an Act of Parliament or declared to be deemed as a University under Section 3 of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 or possess an equivalent qualification.

    Note I:-Candidates who have appeared at an examination the passing of which would render them educationally qualified for the Commission’s examination but have not been informed of the result as also the candidates who intend to appear at such a qualifying examination will also be eligible for admission to the Preliminary Examination.

    All candidates who are declared qualified by the Commission for taking the Civil Services (Main) Examination will be required to produce proof of passing the requisite examination along with their application (i.e. Detailed Application Form-I) for the main Examination, failing which such candidates will not be admitted to the Main Examination. Such proof of passing the requisite examination should be dated earlier than the due date (closing date) of Detailed Application Form-I of the Civil Services (Main) Examination. …..”

    (emphasis supplied)

8. Indeed, the last part of Note I of clause 7 clearly provides that proof of passing the requisite examination should be dated earlier than the due date (closing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top