Shenbagam vs KK Rathinavel - 2022 Supreme(SC) 54

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 54

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, AS BOPANNA
Shenbagam – Appellant
Versus
KK Rathinavel – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr B.Ragunath Adv Mrs. N. C.Kavitha, Adv Mr. Vijay Kumar, AOR
For the Respondent(s): M/S. KSN & Co., AOR

JUDGMENT :

Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J.

A	Factual Background ................................................................... 3
B	Submissions ................................................................................ 7
C	Analysis ...................................................................................... 9
D	Conclusion ................................................................................ 26

A Factual Background

1. The appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 7 January 2019 of a Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Madras. The High Court dismissed the second appeal of the appellants, who are defendants to the suit for specific performance. The High Court confirmed the decree for specific performance, and affirmed the decision of the first appellate court against the decree for specific performance.

2. The appellants are owners of a property located at Patta Nos. 147, 240, 217, Madukkarai Village, Coimbatore Taluk, Coimbatore measuring about 12.60 acres¹[“suit property”]. The firs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 54

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, AS BOPANNAShenbagam – AppellantVersusKK Rathinavel – Respondent

Cases Referred (8)

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, AS BOPANNA
Shenbagam – Appellant
Versus
KK Rathinavel – Respondent