SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
L. NAGESWARA RAO, ANIRUDDHA BOSE, JJ.
Kerala Public Service Commission – Appellants
Versus
K.N. Radhamani & Ors. Etc.Etc. – Respondent
Civil Appeal Nos.1802-1806 of 2010, Transferred Case (Civil) No. 60 of 2014 With
Civil Appeal No. 2822-2823 of 2010
Decided on : 06-09-2021
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Power of High Courts to issue certain writs – Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules, 1969 – Rule 187, 80(3) 109, 320(3)(c) – Civil Appeal – Vacancies in Apex Society or Central Societies – Whether an applicant from that category for said posts, which carry starting pay beyond per month, was required to have minimum educational qualification of graduation or not – Held, court find that for taking further steps in matter of appointment of applicants thereof, Commission was waiting for position of SLP….(CC) now Civil Appeal also, intending intervenors seek to support respondent candidates’ stand in main set of appeals – Court did not consider it necessary to issue notice at this stage as applicants in these interlocutory applications are mainly supporting respondents/writ petitioners in main set of five appeals – As court have upheld stand of respondent candidates, court do not think their intervention is necessary – Appropriate steps shall be taken by Public Service Commission on basis of performance or position in selection process of these applicants for intervention – So far as the I.A. brought by Respondent No. 2 in Civil Appeal is concerned, court find that he has participated in a different selection process and had been appointed as a class IV employee in a District Co-operative Bank on basis of Commission’s advice – He has been further promoted to post of clerk by an order – It is pleaded in his I.A. that he is continuing to work in that capacity – As he has chosen a career path different from that which is subject matter of present set of appeals of connected matters, no relief can be granted to him by antedating his promotion – Application rejected.
JUDGMENT :
ANIRUDDHA BOSE, J.
1. These five appeals and the connected matters relate to controversy over the qualification criteria for appointment to the posts of clerk/cashier in different cooperative banks in the State of Kerala from in-service category. The dispute is as to whether an applicant from that category for the said posts, which carry starting pay beyond Rs. 250/- per month, was required to have minimum educational qualification of graduation or not. As per Rule 187 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules, 1969 framed by the State Government in exercise of power conferred on it by Section 109 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 (the 1969 Act) for appointments to apex societies or central societies, 50% of the vacancies are required to be reserved for the employees of the member societies of the respective apex society or central society. The incumbents from such in-service categories, however require minimum regular service of three years in any of the cadre of such society. It is not in dispute that the posts advertised came within the fold of the classes of societies to which the said Rules apply. Rule 186 thereof, however stipulates that for appointment to posts carrying monthly pay of Rs.250/- and above, the applicants are required to be graduates, i.e. have bachelor degree. There are certain other eligibility criteria prescribed, but in these proceedings the lis is on the point as to whether the in-service candidates required graduation or not. Contention of the in-service candidates is that for them, SSLC or equivalent qualification would be sufficient- which essentially means school clearance certificates. The said 50% reservation rule was applicable to the advertised posts. A Full Bench of the Kerala High Court comprising of three Hon’ble Judges, on reference, inter-alia, held that Rule 186 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules (the said Rules) which prescribe the floor-level pegging of pay to Rs. 250/- in respect of the posts to which recruitment was to be made was not workable as there was no employee with basic pay of Rs. 250/-. The Full Bench referred to another set of notifications and Regulations in holding that such stipulation on graduation for the subject–posts was unsustainable in law. The Kerala Public Service Commission (KPSC), being the recruiting body, is contesting this finding in these proceedings. There are two employment notifications involved inviting applications for the subject- posts, one dated 26th October, 1999 and the other of 25th April, 2006. The aspirants for the said posts, who are the parties to these proceedings were mostly applicants in relation to the 2006 employment notification. The 1999 notification specified the following qualification criteria contained in clause 7 of the employment notification:-
1. B.A./B.Sc./B.Com with HDC or JDC or B.Com with Co-operation or B.Sc. (Co-operation and Banking) of the Kerala Agricultural University.
2. Must have three years regular service in the respective cadre in the Primary Co-operative Society as experience.”
2. So far as the notification dated 25th April, 2006 is concerned, the qualification criteria was contained also in Clause 7 thereof:-
1. B.A/B.Sc./B.Com with HDC or JDC OR B.Com with Co-operation OR B.Sc (Co-operation and Banking) of the Kerala Agricultural University.
2. Must be a regular employee who has completed not less than three years regular service in any cadre and continuing in service in a Member Society/Primary cooperative Society affiliated, to the respective District Co- operative Bank.
(The employee should be in the service of the society not only on the date of application but also on the date of appointment.)”
2. We are concerned in these proceedings with two provisions of the 1969 Act, both conferring power on the State Government to make rules and th
Abdul Rasheed v. Kerala Public Service Commission (2002 (3) KLT 405)
Public Service Commission v. Abdul Rasheed (2007 (3) KLT 881)
The government can prescribe different qualifications for posts within cooperative societies, and challenges to recruitment notifications must be made promptly.
Candidates in Ranked Lists retain rights for appointments post-amalgamation of District Banks, and authorities must act fairly by assessing existing vacancies and complying with statutory recruitment....
Selection – A State instrumentality seized of solemn responsibility of making selections to public services must maintain a high standard of probity and transparency and is not expected to remain neb....
Candidates do not have an absolute vested right to the completion of a recruitment process under repealed rules when substantive policy changes occur. Courts will not adjudicate factual disputes rega....
Qualifications for public service positions must be acquired through regular education, excluding distance-learning degrees from satisfying eligibility criteria.
The court affirmed the Government's authority to establish Recruitment Committees for Milk Producers' Societies under Section 80BB of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, validating recruitment pro....
The distinction between 'appointment' and 'promotion' is crucial, allowing for different legal interpretations and applications of rules regarding suitability tests.
The main legal principle established is that the appointment method and eligibility criteria as per the existing rules at the time of notification should be adhered to, and vacancies should be filled....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.