SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 3204

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
NITIN JAMDAR, CJ., BASANT BALAJI, J.
Bincy S., W/o Suvarnakumar A.S - Appellant
Vs.
The Alapuzha District Co-Operative Bank Limited No. 4203 & Ors. - Respondent
WA NO. 608 of 2021
Decided On : 08-12-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri.M.R.Anison, Smt.Bhargavi V., Smt.P.A.Rinusa
For the Respondent:Shri.Thomas Abraham, Shri K. Gopalakrishna Kurup, Advocate General, Shri Imam Gregorios Karat, GP, Shri.P.C.Sasidharan, Sri.Gilbert George Correya, SC, Kerala State Cooperative Bank Ltd., Sri. Aravinda Kumar Babu T.K.

Candidates in Ranked Lists retain rights for appointments post-amalgamation of District Banks, and authorities must act fairly by assessing existing vacancies and complying with statutory recruitment provisions.

Headnote:(A) Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 - Section 74H, Section 80(3A), Kerala Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act, 2019 - Post amalgamation of District Co-operative Banks with Kerala State Co-operative Bank - Candidates included in the Ranked Lists claim appointments despite amalgamation - Court directed Registrar to assess vacancies and consider candidates while ensuring compliance with statutory provisions and recruitment rules. (Paras 1, 12, 45)

(B) Legal proceedings - Candidates on Ranked Lists have rights to be considered for appointment unless legally precluded - Appellants erroneously contended candidates had no rights post-amalgamation - Court emphasized fair treatment of candidates and compliance with existing merit lists. (Paras 27, 18)

Facts of the case:
Candidates filed appeals concerning appointments to Clerk/Cashier positions in District Co-operative Banks, arguing they were not appointed despite being selected prior to the amalgamation of their banks with the Kerala State Co-operative Bank in 2019. (Paras 10, 18)

Findings of Court:
The court upheld rights of the candidates on the Ranked Lists and directed steps to ensure their consideration for available positions, mandating the Registrar of Co-operative Societies to evaluate vacancies and implement necessary measures, despite the statutory amendments. (Paras 43, 46)

Issues: The core issue was whether candidates who were selected for appointments before the amalgamation retained their rights to be appointed despite statutory changes and the ceasing of the District Banks. (Paras 18, 30)

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that while candidates do not have an indefeasible right to appointment solely based on their placement on a ranked list, the recruiting authority must act fairly and cannot ignore existing lists if vacancies arise. The amalgamation did not equate to complete extinction of rights concerning previously existing appointments. (Paras 28, 38)

Result: Appeals dismissed from Group A; appeals allowed for candidates in Group B, directing that rights concerning appointments from valid Ranked Lists be protected, aligned with the conclusions from Group A. (Paras 43, 45)

Table of Content
1. post amalgamation legal rights of candidates. (Para 1 , 2 , 6)
2. directions for processing applications post-amalgamation. (Para 12 , 17 , 44)
3. jurisdiction of kpsc and legal framework for appointments. (Para 15 , 19 , 20)
4. arbitrariness in fulfilling vacancies after merger. (Para 16 , 28)
5. dismissal of group a appeals, allowance for group b. (Para 43 , 46)

JUDGMENT :

Nitin Jamdar, C.J.

The subject matter of controversy in this group of appeals arising from the judgments of learned Single Judges of this Court relates to the post of Clerk/Cashier in the erstwhile District Co-operative Banks in Kerala. Ranked Lists were prepared by the Kerala Public Service Commission pursuant to the selection process; however, before any appointments could be made from the Ranked Lists, the District Co-operative Banks in the State were amalgamated with the Kerala State Co-operative Bank. Since the candidates included in the Ranked Lists were not appointed, they filed writ petitions seeking appropriate directions for their appointments. Several petitions were filed by individual candidates included in the Ranked Lists, and the dates and events would differ in each matter, but the legal issue being the same in all the appeals, they are dealt with by this common judgment.

2. In one set of writ petitions (Group ‘A’), the learned Single Judge (Devan Ramachandran, J.) held in favour of the Petitioners/Candidates and issued certain directions. In the other set of writ petitions (Group ‘B’), the learned Single Judge (Amit Rawal, J.) dismissed the petitions. From the judgment rendered in Group ‘A’ petitions, in favour of the Petitioners/ Candidates, two sets of appeals have been preferred – one by the Kerala State Co-operative Bank Limited (the State Bank) and in some cases by the District Co-operative Banks (District Banks), and the other by the Secretary, Department of Co-operation, as well as the Registrar and Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, State of Kerala. From Group ‘B’, the candidates whose petitions were dismissed have filed appeals challenging the dismissal.

3. (i) Group ‘A’ petitions consists of W.P.(C) Nos. 26338/2017, 26491/2017, 26956/2017, 11657/2018, 29805/2018, 38191/2018, 11109/2019, 22690/2019, 23087/2019, 27908/2019, 27938/2019, 29955/2019, 31456/2019, 33040/2019, 33724/2019, 33837/2019, 34299/2019, 34895/2019, 35177/2019, 260/2020, 742/2020, 4525/2021, and 22082/2021.

(ii) From Group ‘A’, the first set of appeals by the Banks are W.A. Nos. 1736/2022, 1794/2022, 1805/2022, 1806/2022, 1809/2022, 1815/2022, 1830/2022, 1840/2022, 1843/2022, 1850/2022, 1854/2022, 1859/2022, 1880/2022, 1889/2022, 1904/2022, 1938/2022, 1939/2022, 1943/2022, 1963/2022, 1968/2022, 1977/2022, 1979/2022, 2004/2022, 2019/2022, 764/2023, and 1124/2023.

(iii) The second set of appeals from Group ‘A’ by the State are, W.A. Nos. 969/2023, 1271/2023, 1461/2023, 1542/2023, 1551/2023, 1564/2023, 1565/2023, 1568/2023, 1580/2023, 1583/2023, 1585/2023, 1586/2023, 1589/2023, 1591/2023, 1594/2023, 1649/2023, 1652/2023, 1685/2023, 1689/2023, 1856/2023, 1901/2023, 1907/2023, 1993/2023, 2006/2023, 2009/2023, 2025/2023, and 2135/2023.

4. Group ‘B’ petitions consist of W.P.(C) Nos. 31786/2018 and 29057/2019, filed by fifteen candidates who were included in the Ranked Lists for appointment to the post of Clerk/Cashier. From Group ‘B’, the appeals filed by the Petitioners/Candidates are W.A. Nos. 608/2021, 622/2021 and 637/2021. There is another petition, that is, W.P.(C) No. 1866/2020, filed by the candidates included in the Ranked List, who belong to the Other Backward Class. This petition was disposed of by judgment dated 23 February 2021 (Amit Rawal, J.). From that judgment, W.A. No. 853/2021 is filed by the Petitioners/Candidates.

5. The Appellant – State and the Appellant – Kerala State Co-operative Bank Limited in the appeals arising from Group ‘A’ petitions are referred to as ‘the Appellants’. The Respondents in the appeals from the Group ‘A’ petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top