SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 184

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Ramji Lal Sharma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Gopal Jha, AOR Mr. Nishant Verma, Adv Mr. Shreyash Bhardwaj, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 13.12.2018 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior in Criminal Appeal No. 339 of 2006, by which, the High Court has allowed the said appeal and has acquitted respondent No. 1 and 2 herein-original accused No. 1 and 3, for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC, by giving benefit of doubt, the State of Madhya Pradesh has preferred the present appeal.

2. As per the prosecution case sometime prior to 8:30 in the morning of 17.01.2002, one Devendra S/o Bhagirath, brother of deceased Munshilal, went to the house of accused Ramjilal for demanding money for grinding of wheat in the flour mill and accused persons Mukesh (A4) and Brijesh (A3) met him. When Devendra demanded money, then, accused No. 3 and accused No. 4 assaulted him with kicks and punches. Somehow, he rescued himself. The said incident was brought to the notice of the complainant Laxminarayan. The brother of Devendra, namely, Ramgopal and father Bhagirath, went to the house of accused persons for enquiring about the scuffle. All the accused were going towards the house

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top