S. H. VORA, RAJENDRA M. SAREEN
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
MER RANA UKA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Rajendra M. Sareen, J.)
1. Present Criminal Appeal has been preferred by the appellant – State of Gujarat under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the judgment and order dated 20/01/1995 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Junagadh in Sessions Case No.96 of 1992 acquitting the respondent Nos.1 to 4 – original accused Nos.1 to 4 from the offence punishable under sections 302, 34 and 506(2) of Indian Penal Code.
It is pertinent to note that the appeal against the respondent Nos.2 to 4 – original accused Nos.2 & 4 stood abated vide order dated 12/04/2022. Hence, the present appeal is proceeded against the respondent Nos.1 & 3 – original accused Nos.1 & 3.
2. The crux of the case of the prosecution is as under :-
Accused Nos.1 to 3 are sons of the accused No.4. Accused No.4 is the brother of the complainant Ramabhai. - Rama Mulu - brother of the accused No.4 and original complainant Hardas has died. There was dispute of partition of land amongst the three brothers because the Puja - son of the deceased Rama has not received any share in the land situated at Koyli Math and hence Puja Rama has filed case in the Court for obtaining his share, whe
Chandrappa and ors. vs. State of Karnataka
Bhaiyamiyan Alias Jardar Khan and Another vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Rajesh Singh & Others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Arulvelu and another versus State
The presumption of innocence and the requirement for clear evidence of guilt are central legal principles established in the judgment.
The appellate court upheld the acquittal of the accused, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the importance of reliable evidence for a conviction.
While dealing with judgment of acquittal, unless reasoning by learned trial Court is found to be perverse, acquittal cannot be upset. It is further observed that High Court's interference in such app....
The judgment reinforces the principle of presumption of innocence and the requirement for clear and convincing evidence to establish guilt, emphasizing the reluctance to disturb a finding of acquitta....
The presumption of innocence in favor of the accused and the requirement for clear and convincing evidence to prove guilt, especially in cases of acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.