SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 220

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, M. M. SUNDRESH
SAUDAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Indresh Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Akhilesh Yadav, Adv. Mr. Sorav Singh, Adv. Mr. Mohammad Arif, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Chawla, Adv. Ms. Pankhuri Gupta, Adv. Mr. Mayank Kshirsagar, Adv. Mr. Brijesh Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Tushar Singh, AOR Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Nandani Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mamta Sharma, Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta, AOR Mr. Anubhav, Adv. Mr. Yashwant Singh Yadav, Adv. Ms. Preeti Yadav, Adv. Mr. Vijay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ravi Karhana, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehtrotra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nagendra Singh, Adv. Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Adv. Mr. Ashish Pandey, Adv. Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, AOR
For the Respondents: Ms. Garima Prashad, Sr. Adv./AAG Mr. Sarvesh Singh Baghel, AOR Mr. Srinivas Vishven, Adv. Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, AOR Mr. Rohit Pandey, Adv. Mr. Shantanu Singh, Adv. Mrs. Priyanka Singh, Adv. Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Adv. Ms. Neelakshi Bhaskar, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Shankar Jain, AOR Mr. Dhawal Uniyal, Adv. Ms. Marbiang N. Khongwir, Adv. Mr. Shashank Shekhar Singh, AOR Mr. Manish Shanker Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Kalpana, Adv. Ms. Pallavi Baghel, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Nikhil Goel, Adv. Ms. Naveen Goel, Adv. Mr. Vinay Mathew, Adv. Mr. Kartik Kaushal, Adv. Mr. Aditya Koshy Roy, Adv., Ms. Sweta Rani, AOR Mr. Arun Adlakha, Adv. Mr. Naman Gupta, Adv. Mr. Prakash Sharma, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, AOR

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant has been in custody for around 8 years and the appeal has not been decided yet. The appellant is granted bail on terms and conditions to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Apart from any other conditions to be imposed by the trial Court, the appellant will report to the local police station on the first Monday of every month in the forenoon.

3. In order to find a holistic solution to the problem of hearing of appeal and grant of bail in criminal matters in the Allahabad High Court, in terms of our Order dated 05.10.2021, we were not wanting to detain the matters qua bail. Thus, we directed the bail matters to be placed before the High Court and the Registry to register a Suo moto proceeding and place them before the Court on 16.11.2021. We note with some surprise and consternation that despite the said Order, as per the office report, while the suo moto proceedings have been so registered, they were not listed on 16.11.2021 nor on any date thereafter.

4. We have a report of the High Court of Allahabad which seeks to suggest that the 18 matters remitted to the High Court for consideration of bail were listed on 15.11.2021, 16.11.2021 and 17.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top