Back
L. NAGESWARA RAO, B. R. GAVAI
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
LT. GEN. (RETD. ) S. K. SAHNI – Respondent
JUDGMENT
B.R. GAVAI, J.
1. Criminal Appeal No.2169 of 2014 is filed by Union of India and others challenging the orders passed by Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh Regional Bench at Chandimandir (hereinafter referred to as the “AFT”) dated 10th October 2013 in MA No. 1871 of 2012 and OA No. 262 of 2011 to the effect that it reduces the sentence of three years rigorous imprisonment and cashiering imposed on the respondent hereinLt. Gen. (Retd.) S.K. Sahni to dismissal from the service as provided in Section 71(e) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the “AFT Act”), and 21st March 2014 in MA Nos. 3201 and 3202 of 2014 in OA No. 262 of 2011, whereby the learned AFT refused to grant leave to appeal.
2. Transferred Case (Criminal) No. 1 of 2017 is filed by the petitioner therein (respondent herein), originally before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana being Criminal Writ Petition No. 1895 of 2013, challenging the dismissal of MA No. 1871 of 2012 and OA No. 262 of 2011, which was filed challenging the order dated 18th February 2011, passed by the General
There are inherent limitations on jurisdiction of Apex Court and it will not be permissible to reappreciate evidence as recorded by GCM unless Apex Court finds that material factors have been either ....
(1) If view taken by Armed Forces Tribunal is found to be a plausible one, it will not be permissible for this Court to interfere with same only because this court finds other view to be more probabl....
The sharing of sensitive information by a military officer, jeopardizing security, constitutes willful negligence warranting reprimand, regardless of prior findings of not guilty.
Termination of service is permissible under Section 10 of the Border Security Force Act when the trial is deemed impracticable or inexpedient, especially after non-confirmation of charges by the Conf....
The dismissal of the petitioner was quashed due to a flawed inquiry process that violated principles of natural justice, resulting in shockingly disproportionate punishment.
Procedural violations in public procurement can constitute criminal misconduct under the Prevention of Corruption Act, highlighting the need for transparency and adherence to regulations in awarding ....
The necessity of providing reasons in administrative decisions is crucial for ensuring accountability and facilitating judicial review.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
