Pattali Makkal Katchi vs A. Mayilerumperumal

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 298

L. NAGESWARA RAO, B. R. GAVAI
Pattali Makkal Katchi – Appellant
Versus
A. Mayilerumperumal – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the parties :Mr. G. Sivabalamurugan, AOR Mr. S.Thananjayan, Adv. Mr. Ilavarasan, Advocate Ms. Promila, AOR Mr. B.Karunakaran,Adv. Mr. M.R.Jothi Manian,Adv. Mr. Sasikumar,Adv. Mr. Elavarasan,Adv. Mr. Anoop Prakash Awasthi, AOR Mr. MN Rao Sr.Adv. Mr. S. Thananjayan, AOR Mr. K Balu,Adv. Mr. M.R.Jothimanian adv Mr. Radhakrishnan, Sr.Adv. Mr. S. Thananjayan, AOR Mr. K Balu,Adv. Mr. M.R.Jothimanian adv Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Mr. Gowtham Kumar,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Sen Gupta,Adv. Ms. Garima Jain,Adv. Ms. Aakriti Priya,Adv. Md. Shahrukh,Adv. Mr. Prateek Yadav,Adv. Mr. Suhail Ahmed,adv. Ms. Lakshmi Rao,Adv. Mr. C.S.Vaidyanathan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Gowtham Kumar,Adv. Ms. Diksha Rai, AOR Mr. Ankit Agarwal,Adv. Mr. Prateek Bhardwaj,Adv. Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi Sr Adv Mr. Varun K Chopra Adv. Mr. D.Kumanan, AOR Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi,Sr.Adv. Mr. V.Krishna Murthy,Sr.Adv. Mr. D.Kumanan, AOR Mr. P.Wilson,Sr.Adv. Mr. D.Kumanan, AOR Mr. Mukul Rohtagi,Sr.Adv. Mr. V.Krishna Murthy,Sr.Adv. Mr. D.Kumanan, AOR Mr. M.Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. RajaRajeshwaran. S, Adv Mr. P.M. Vishnu Varthanan, Adv Mr. R. Vignesh, Adv Mr. M.Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. Prabhu Rama Subramanian,Adv. Mr. Raghunatha Sethupathi,Adv. Mr. Karuppaiah Mayyappan,Adv. Mr. Raja Rajeshwaran,Adv. Mr. Murugendran,Adv. Mr. K.Nagendra Prasad,Adv. Ms. Priya R.,Adv. Mr. Colin Gonsalves,Sr.Adv. Mr. Shiyas Kumar,Adv. Mr. Satya Mitra,AOR Mr. K.M.Vijayan,Sr.Adv. Mr. S. Gowthaman, AOR Ms. M.Venmani,Adv. Mr. Beno Bencigar,Adv. Mr. K.V.Jagdishwaran,Adv. Mr. N.P.Haibila,Adv. Mr. Parijat Kishore, AOR Mr. Satya Mitra, AOR Mr. Jaideep Gupta,Sr.Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Mr. Anu K.Joy,Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar,Adv. Mr. Dama Seshadiri Naidu, Adv. Mr. M.P.Parthiban, Adv. Mr. R. Sudhakaran, Adv. Mr. Ananvay Anandvardhan, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Chapalgaokar, Adv. Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Sr Adv. Mr. Gopal Shankaranarayanan, Sr. Adv. Mr. M.P.Parthiban, Adv. Ms. Shalini Mishra, Adv. Ms. Shivani Vij, Adv. Mr. V. Prakash, Sr. Adv. Mr. M.P.Parthiban, AOR, Mr. Porkodi, Adv. Mr. S. Ramasubramanian, Adv. Mr. A.S.Vairawan, Adv. Mr. C. Ramar, Adv. Mr. G.Ananda Selvam,Adv. Mr. Mayil Sami K.,Adv. Mr. Muthu Ganesa Pandian,Adv. Dr. Ram Sankar,Adv. Dr. A. Santhakumaran,Adv. Mr. S.Vinayak,Adv. Mr. Sanchit Maheshwari,Adv. Ms. Lakshmi Ramamurthy, AOR Mr. R.Balasubramanian,Sr.Adv. Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, AOR Mr. Ashish Kumar Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Y.Lokesh,Adv. Mr. V.sibi Kargil,Adv. Mr. Arun Singh,Adv. Mr. Anubhav Chaturvedi,Adv. Mr. Abhisar Thakral,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Agarwal,Adv. Mr. N.B.V.Srinivasa Reddy,Adv. Mr. N.Suresha,Adv. Mr. G.S.Mani,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Maurya,Adv. Mr. Abhay Singh Yadav,Adv. Mr. Kunwar Siddartha,Adv. Mr. Ajay Singh,Adv. Mr. R. Sathish, AOR Mr. R.Anand,Adv. Mr. Nithin Saravanan,Adv. Ms. Arunima Singh,Adv. Ms. Priyadarshini,Adv. Mr. Ridhim Malhotra,adv. Ms. Manicka Priya Saravanan,Adv. Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, AOR Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, AOR Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR Mr. Raghunatha Sethupathy B,Adv. Mr. Karuppaiah Meyyappan,Adv. Ms. Priya R,Adv. Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, AOR Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, AOR Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Visen,Adv. Mr. A.Rajarajan,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Babita Mishra,Adv. Mr. Prabhu Ramasubramanian,Adv. Mr. Raghunatha Sethupathy B. Adv. Mr. G.Murugendran,Adv. Mr. Karuppaiah Meeyyappan,Adv. Ms. Priya R., Adv.

Table of Content
1. unconstitutionality of the tamil nadu reservation act 2021 (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. historical context of reservation laws in tamil nadu (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. need for quantitative data in reservation legislation (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. challenges to the tamil nadu backward classes commission's reports (Para 10 , 11)
5. arguments for and against the 2021 act's validity (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
6. judicial interpretation of the 102nd and 105th amendment acts (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
7. court's evaluation of legislative competence (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
8. constitutional provisions for sub-classification (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
9. caste-based classification in reservations (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
10. criteria for adequate representation in reservations (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
11. impact of outdated data on legislative recommendations (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
12. court's examination of the evidence basis for reservations (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
13. validating criteria for caste-based reservations (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
14. requirement of legislative consultation on major policy changes (Para 46 , 47 , 48)
15. final conclusions on the constitutionality of the 2021 act (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 298

L. NAGESWARA RAO, B. R. GAVAIPattali Makkal Katchi – AppellantVersusA. Mayilerumperumal – Respondent

L. NAGESWARA RAO, B. R. GAVAI
Pattali Makkal Katchi – Appellant
Versus
A. Mayilerumperumal – Respondent