SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 630

ORISSA HIGH COURT
JAGANNATH SAMAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, J.

1. Heard learned counsels appearing for the parties.

2. Since the core issue in the present batch of Writ Petitions involves sustainability of the clarification issued by the Govt. in the ST and SC Development Department-Opp. Party No.3 on 06.05.2024 as well as 27.02.2025 basing on the view given by the Law Department on 27.02.2024 and consequential action taken thereof in the eye of law, all the matters were heard analogously and disposed of by the present common order. For the sake of brevity and convenience, W.P.(C) No.7674 of 2025 was treated as the leading case.

3. It is the case of the petitioners that petitioners while working as Asst. Engineers (Civil), they were found eligible for promotion to the rank of Assistant Executive Engineer (Civil) in the year 2024 in the DPC held on 04.09.2024. Petitioners were recommended to get the benefit of promotion by the DPC. However, basing on the impugned clarification issued by the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, ST and SC Development Department on 06.05.2024 and further communication issued by the Department on 27.02.2025, recommendation made by the DPC when was cancelled vide Notification dated 04.03.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top