Ardhendu Kumar Das vs State Of Odisha

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 513

B. R. GAVAI, HIMA KOHLI
Ardhendu Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Priya Hingorani, Himanshu yadav, Anirudh Sanwal, Mahalakshmi Pavani, Tomy Chacko, Ankolekar Gurudatta, Vinay Navare, Gautam Das, Sangram Pattnaik, Sasmita Tripathy, Merusagar Samantaray, Joydip Roy, Rahul G.Tanwani, Pravartak Pathak, Tapas Parida, Tarun Samantaray, Abani Kanta Sahu, Santosh Ku. Rout, Dhirendra Kumar Jha, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Kapil Sibal, Ashok Parija, Pinaki Mishra, Gaurav Khanna, Dhananjaya Mishra, Arnav Behera, Avnish Kr.Sharma, Pai Amit, Pankhuri Bhardwaj, Swetaretu Mishra, Sanjay K.Das, V.K.Monga, A.D.N.Rao, Annam Venkatesh, Rahul Mishra, Amit P.Shahi, D. Shiva Shankar, Ananya Khandelwal, Agrimaa Singh, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

B.R. GAVAI, J

1. Both these petitions challenge the interlocutory order dated 9th May, 2022, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack, in Writ Petition (Civil) No.6257 of 2022, wherein the Division Bench of the High Court has recorded certain submissions and statements made by the learned Advocate General appearing on behalf of the State of Odisha and directed the matter to be posted on 22nd June, 2022 along with Writ Petition (Civil) No. 10153 of 2022. From the tenor of the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners, it appears that they are basically aggrieved since the High Court has not granted an interim order restraining the respondents from proceeding further with the construction.

2. The factual background leading to the filing of the present proceedings is thus:

3. A Public Interest Litigation being Writ Petition (Civil) No.6257 of 2022 came to be filed before the High Court of Orissa by one Dillip Kumar Baral challenging the alleged unsanctioned and unauthorised construction activities undertaken by the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 within the prohibited area of the Shree Jagannath Temple complex in contravention of the provi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 513

B. R. GAVAI, HIMA KOHLIArdhendu Kumar Das – AppellantVersusState Of Odisha – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

B. R. GAVAI, HIMA KOHLI
Ardhendu Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent