SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 570

SURYA KANT, J. B. PARDIWALA
Kamal Khudal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Vivek Sharma, Advocate, (A.C.)

JUDGMENT

J.B. Pardiwala, J.

This appeal, by special leave, is at the instance of a convict accused of the offence of murder and is directed against the judgment and order passed by the Gauhati High Court dismissing the Criminal Appeal No. 86 of 2010 by which it affirmed the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Sivasagar in the Sessions Case No. 57 of 2008 dated 10.06.2010.

2. It appears from the materials on record that in all three accused persons were put on trial in the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Sivasagar, including the appellant herein. All the three accused were charged with the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, "IPC"). The trial court, vide its judgment dated 10.06.2010, held the appellant herein along with one Munna Bhoi (A-1) guilty of the offence of murder punishable under Section 302 IPC and sentenced them to undergo life imprisonment with fine of Rs. 2,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, further rigorous imprisonment for a period of two months. The third co-accused Bipon Bhoi was given the benefit of doubt and he came to be acquitted.

3. The


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top