A. M. KHANWILKAR, ABHAY S. OKA, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
All India Haj Umrah Tour Organizer Association Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Abhay S. Oka, J.
The broad question involved in this group of writ petitions is about the liability of Haj Group Organizers (HGOs) or Private Tour Operators (PTOs) to pay service tax on the service rendered by them to Haj pilgrims for the Haj pilgrimage.
FACTUAL ASPECTS
2. The Haj pilgrimage is undertaken by thousands of pilgrims from India, either through the Haj Committee of India (for short, the Haj Committee') or HGOs. There is a bilateral treaty between India and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. As per the said bilateral arrangement, the Haj pilgrimage can be undertaken from India only through the Haj Committee or HGOs.
3. The service tax regime was introduced in India in the year 1994 under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 (for short the Finance Act'). Initially, very few services were made subject to payment of service tax. However, by subsequent Finance Acts, a large number of services were added to the list from time to time. The total number of services subjected to service tax exceeded 100. A negative list regime was introduced by Act No.23 of 2012 with effect from 1st July 2012. By Act No.23 of 2012, Sections 66-B and 66-C were added. Section 66-B is the charging
Union of India & Ors. v. Bengal Shrachi Housing Development Ltd. and Anr. 2018 (1) SCC 311 [Para 30]
Union of India & Ors. v. Rafique Shiekh Bhikan and Anr. 2012 (6) SCC 265 [Para 9]
Sun Export Corpn. v. Collector of Customs
State of Orissa v. Sudhansu Sekhar Misra
Sanghvi Jeevraj Ghewar Chand & Ors. v. Secretary
Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v. Union of India 1970 (1) SCC 248 [Para 19]
R.K. Garg v. Union of India & Ors. 1981 (4) SCC 675 [Paras 62 & 64]
R.C. Jall v. Union of India 1962 Supp3 SCR 436 [Para 30]
P.M. Ashwathanarayana Setty & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors. 1989 Supp1 SCC 696 [Para 29]
M. Jhangir Bhatusha & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. 1989 Supp2 SCC 201 [Para 29]
Kunnathat Thatehunni Moopil Nair
In Re the Special Courts Bill 1978
Government of Kerala & Anr. v. Mother Superior Adoration Convent 2021 (5) SCC 602 [Para 11]
Customs (Preventive) Mumbai v. M. Ambalal and Company 2011 (2) SCC 74 [Para 49]
Bharat Surfactants (Private) Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr. 1989 (4) SCC 21 [Para 29]
All–India Federation of Tax Practitioners & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. 2007 (7) SCC 527 [Para 14]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.