D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SURYA KANT
State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Krishidhan Seeds Private Limited – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The National Company Law Tribunal, [“NCLT”] by its judgment dated 16 September 2020, rejected the application dated 19 September 2018 [TP No 82/2019 in CP (IB) No 500/7/NCLT/AHM/2018] filed by the State Bank of India, the appellant, under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 [“IBC”] against the respondent, the alleged Corporate Debtor, for initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [“CIRP”].
2. The respondent received credit facilities from the appellant commencing from 30 November 2006. According to the appellant, as on 24 June 2013, the outstanding under the credit facilities extended to the respondent totaled to Rs 102.4 crores. In lieu of these credit facilities, the respondent (along with other persons) provided securities in favor of the appellant. The respondent allegedly failed to honor the terms of these credit facilities and defaulted on their repayments. Hence, the respondent’s account with the appellant was classified as a Non-Performing Asset [“NPA”] on 10 June 2014.
3. Thereafter, at various junctures, the appellant aimed to seek recourse to Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interes
Laxmi Pat Surana v Union Bank of India and Another
Dena Bank v C. Shivakumar Reddy [(2021) 10 SCC 330]
Devas Multimedia Private Ltd. v Antrix Corporation Ltd. and Another [2022 SCC OnLine SC 46]
Rajendra Narottamdas Sheth and Another v Chandra Prakash Jain and Another
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited v Bishal Jaiswal and Another
Sesh Nath Singh v Baidyabati Sheoraphuli Coop. Bank Ltd. [(2021) 7 SCC 313
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.