UDAY UMESH LALIT, S.RAVINDRA BHAT
Jarnail Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 05.12.2019 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in CRM-M No.51755 of 2019 (O&M).
3. Apprehending arrest in connection with crime registered pursuant to First Information Report No.271/2019 dated 18.09.2019 lodged with Police Station City Kapurthala, District Kapurthala, Punjab, for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471, 120-B, 467 IPC, the appellant preferred an application for anticipatory bail in terms of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The application having been rejected by the High Court, the present appeal has been preferred.
4. While issuing notice vide order dated 06.01.2020, this Court granted interim relief and directed that no coercive steps be taken against the appellant.
5. Ms. Jaspreet Gogia, learned Advocate appearing for the State submits that the investigation into the crime otherwise is complete but the appellant did not cooperate with the investigation.
6. Considering the entirety of the situation, in our view, the appellant is entitled to the relief of anticipatory bail. We, therefore, allow this appeal, set-aside the order pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.