SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 785

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, JJ.
M/s. Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rambha Devi & Ors. – Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 1475, 1506, 1479, 841, 1477, 842, 483, 1478, 1476 OF 2018, Diary No.40406, 41949 of 2017, 2524, 23636, 23638, 24137, 24530, 24534, 24834, 25256, 32753, 32756, 37055, 39059, 9970, 990, 9963, 37270/2017 4869, 6119, 6264 OF 2018, Civil Appeal Nos.8001-8002 of 2019, SLP(C) Nos.14645-14646, 35472-35473/2017, 6055, 24671, 597, 524, 9604, 9613, 17506, 19242-19244, 2684-2685, 5065, 10459, 9908, 6668, 8816, 9607, 9610, 9612, 9608, 9606, 9609, 28906, 5193, 5188, 9611, 9605 of 2018, 18849 426 505-506 5958 11503-11504 13315 14523-14524 20449 21547 23017-23018 24545 30420-30421 of 2019, 766 of 2020, 3735-3736, 696 of 2021
Decided on : 08-03-2022

The central legal point established in the judgment is the need to revisit the interpretation of driving licences for different classes of vehicles and the recognition of overlooked provisions in the previous decision.

Headnote:

Driving Licence - Motor Vehicles Act - Section 2(21), Section 2(15), Section 2(48), Section 10(2)(d), Section 10(2)(e), Section 10(2)(f), Section 10(2)(g), Section 10(2)(h), Section 4(1), Section 4(2), Section 7, Section 14, Rule 5, Rule 31 - The court revisited the issue of whether a person holding a driving licence for a light motor vehicle could drive a transport vehicle of light motor vehicle class. The court discussed various provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, including the definition of 'light motor vehicle', the age requirements for driving licences, the currency of licences, and the difference in training requirements between transport and non-transport vehicles.

Fact of the Case:

The court revisited the issue of whether a person holding a driving licence for a light motor vehicle could drive a transport vehicle of light motor vehicle class.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that certain provisions were not noticed in the previous decision and deemed it appropriate to refer the matters to a larger bench for reconsideration.

Issues: The issues included the interpretation of various provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act and the need to revisit the controversy regarding driving licences for different classes of vehicles.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the need to reconsider the interpretation of the relevant provisions and the recognition that certain provisions were not noticed in the previous decision.

Final Decision: The matters were referred to a larger bench for reconsideration, and the court directed the Registry to place the matters before the Chief Justice of India to constitute a bench of appropriate strength.

ORDER :

1. On a reference made by a Two-Judge Bench in Civil Appeal No.841 of 2018 and other connected matters, these matters have been listed before us.

2. The referral order dated 03.05.2018 notes that a Three-Judge Bench of this Court in Mukund Dewangan v. Oriental Insurance Company Limited, (2017) 14 SCC 663, considered inter alia question whether a person holding a driving licence in respect of “light motor vehicle”, could on the strength of that licence, be entitled to drive a “transport vehicle of light motor vehicle class” having unladen weight not exceeding 7500 kgs. The referral order quoted the conclusions drawn in paragraphs 60 to 60.4 in Mukund Dewangan (supra):

    “60. Thus, we answer the questions which are referred to us thus:

    60.1. “Light motor vehicle” as defined in Section 2(21) of the Act would include a transport vehicle as per the weight prescribed in Section 2(21) read with Sections 2(15) and 2(48). Such transport vehicles are not excluded from the definition of the light motor vehicle by virtue of Amendment Act 54 of 1994.

    60.2. A transport vehicle and omnibus, the gross vehicle weight of either of which does not exceed 7500 kg would be a light motor vehicle and also motor car or tractor or a roadroller, “unladen weight” of which does not exceed 7500 kg and holder of a driving licence to drive class of “light motor vehicle” as provided in Section 10(2)(d) is competent to drive a transport vehicle or omnibus, the gross vehicle weight of which does not exceed 7500 kg or a motor car or tractor or roadroller, the “unladen weight” of which does not exceed 7500 kg. That is to say, no separate endorsement on the licence is required to drive a transport vehicle of light motor vehicle class as enumerated above. A licence issued under Section 10(2)(d) continues to be valid after Amendment Act 54 of 1994 and 28-3-2001 in the form.

    60.3. The effect of the amendment made by virtue of Act 54 of 1994 w.e.f. 14-11-1994 while substituting clauses (e) to (h) of Section 10(2) which contained “medium goods vehicle” in Section 10(2)(e), “medium passenger motor vehicle” in Section 10(2)(f), “heavy goods vehicle” in Section 10(2)(g) and “heavy passenger motor vehicle” in Section 10(2)(h) with expression “transport vehicle” as substituted in Section 10(2)(e) related only to the aforesaid substituted classes only. It does not exclude transport vehicle, from the purview of Section 10(2)(d) and Section 2(41) of the Act i.e. light motor vehicle.

    60.4. The effect of amendment of Form 4 by insertion of “transport vehicle” is related only to the categories which were substituted in the year 1994 and the procedure to obtain driving licence for transport vehicle of class of “light motor vehicle” continues to be the same as it was and has not been changed and there is no requirement to obtain separate endorsement to drive transport vehicle, and if a driver is holding licence to drive light motor vehicle, he can drive transport vehicle of such class without any endorsement to that effect.”

    Thereafter certain provisions which were not brought to the notice of the Court deciding Mukund Dewangan (supra) were noted. Those provisions as quoted in the order of reference were as under:

    “1. Section 4(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) provides that the minimum age of holding a driving licence for a motor vehicle is 18 years. Section 4(2) provides that no person under the age of 20 years shall drive a transport vehicle in a public place.

    2. Section 7 provides that no person can be granted a learner’s licence to drive a transport vehicle unless he has held a driving licence to drive a light motor vehicle for at least one year.

    3. Section 14 deals with the currency of licence to drive motor vehicles. A driving licence issued or renewed under this Act, in case a licence to drive a transport vehicle will be effective for a period of three years. The proviso to Section 14(2)(a) provides that in case of a licence to drive a tra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top