Amar Vivek Aggarwal vs High Court of Punjab and Haryana

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 817

UDAY UMESH LALIT, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, S.RAVINDRA BHAT
Amar Vivek Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Punjab and Haryana – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Ms. Indira Jaising, Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Dr. Anindita Pujari, Mr. Siddhartha Shrivastava, Mr. Paras Nath Singh, Mr. Azad Bansala, Ms. Prakriti Rastogi, Mr. Tushar Mehta, Ms. Madhavi Divan, Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Ms. Shraddha Deshmukh, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Ms. Madhavi Divan, Mr. Prashant Singh, Mr. K.V. Viswanathan, Mr. Ashok Mathur, Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Mr. Udita Singh, Mr. Tamim Qadri, Mr. Saeed Qadri, Mr. Manish Raghav, Mr. Vivek Sharma, Mr. Sumit Saddi, Ms. Neelu Sharma, Ms. Rachana Sharma, Mr. Rohit Gour, Mr. Niranjan Sahu, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Nayak, Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra, Mr. Arush Bhandari, Mr. Rajat Sehgal, Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Mr. Ashish Madaan, Mr. Malak Manish Bhatt, Mr. Sunny Choudhary, Mr. Purvish Jitendra Malkan, Mr. Merusagar Samantaray, Mr. Anandh Kannan N., Ms. Nandini Gore, Mr. Tuhin, Mr. Pai Amit, Mr. Anirudh Sanganeria, Mr. Avinash Sharma, Dr. Joseph Aristotle S.

ORDER :

1. In terms of the Signed Order, certain directions have been issued in these matters. The relevant part of the Order reads as under:

“MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 709 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 454 OF 2015

xxx xxx xxx

However, insofar as the submissions raised by Ms. Indira Jaising with respect to Prayer (c) of Miscellaneous Application No. 709 of 2022 are concerned, we see no reason to defer the matter. The submissions arise purely on the text of the judgment as it stands.

We, therefore, clarify the situation and direct that instead of ten marks to be allocated to a counsel who has put in between ten to twenty years of practice, the marks be allocated commensurate with the standing of the person at the Bar, that is to say, one mark each shall be allocated for every year of practice between ten to twenty years. Prayer (c) made in the application is, therefore granted. This modification shall be effective from the date of this order.

Rest of the prayers made in the Miscellaneous Application No. 709 of 2022 shall be taken up alongwith other matters on 12.05.2022.

MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 527 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 454 OF 2015

Mr. Sidharth Luthra, learn

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 817

UDAY UMESH LALIT, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, S.RAVINDRA BHATAmar Vivek Aggarwal – AppellantVersusHigh Court of Punjab and Haryana – Respondent

UDAY UMESH LALIT, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, S.RAVINDRA BHAT
Amar Vivek Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Punjab and Haryana – Respondent