SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 783

AJAY RASTOGI, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Barun Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Abhishek R. Shukla, Adv. Mr. Md. Ali, AOR Mr. Tushar Bakshi, AOR Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR Mr. Brajesh Pandey, Adv. Mr. Anilendra Pandey, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Kapil Sibal, SR. Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR Ms. Anusha Nagarajan, Adv. Mr. Samten D., Adv. Mr. Sourabh Tandon, Adv. Mr. Ritansh Vats, Adv. Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sahil Bhalaik, AOR Mr. Tushar Giri, Adv. Ms. Tanya Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Shubhashis R. Soren, Adv. Mr. Bhakti Vardhan Singh, AOR Mr. Vatsalya Vigya, AOR Mr. Puneet Jain, Adv. Mr. Vigyan Shah, Adv. Ms. Christi Jain, AOR Ms. Shruti Singh, Adv. Mr. Yogit Kamat, Adv. Mr. Akshit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Deshwal, Adv. Mr. Mann Arora, Adv. Mr. Kamlesh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Harendra Neel, Adv. Mr. Umang Mehta, Adv. Mr. Pukhraj Chawla, Adv. Mr. Yash Joshi, Adv. Ms. Shipra Singh, Adv. Mr. Saran Sharma, Adv. Ms. Pragya Seth, Adv. Ms. Keshika Jain, Adv. Mr. Arunabh Chowdhury, Sr. Adv. Ms. Pragya Baghel, Adv. Ms. Pallavi Langar, AOR Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, AOR Mr. Parth Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Gopal Shankaranarayanan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Amit Agrawal, AOR Mr. Vigyan Shah, Adv. Ms. Tanya Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Akshit Gupta, Adv. Ms. Radhika Yadav, Adv. Mr. Rajneesh Bhaskar, Adv. Mr. S. R. Setia, AOR Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Neelmani Pant, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Mehra, AOR Mr. Prashant Shukla, Adv. Mr. S. Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Shanker Singh, Adv. Ms. Shreya Mishra, Adv. Mr. Shonak Sharma, Adv. Ms. A. Walia, Adv. Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Rastogi, J.

Civil Appeal @ SLP (C) No(s).4310 OF 2022

Civil Appeal @ SLP (C) No(s).4443 OF 2022

Civil Appeals @ SLP (C) No(s).5338­5341 OF 2022

Civil Appeal @ SLP (C) No(s).5409 OF 2022

1. Leave granted.

2. The present batch of appeals has been preferred by the candidates who on qualifying the 6th Combined Civil Services Examination, 2016, conducted by respondent no.3, Jharkhand Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as “the Commission”) and having been appointed on the recommendations made by the Commission, completed their period of probation and got regular postings, their appointments have been cancelled initially by the learned Single Judge by its judgment dated 7th June, 2021, which came to be affirmed by the Division Bench of the High Court on dismissal of the Letters Patent Appeal filed at the instance of the present appellants by judgment and order impugned dated 23rd February, 2022.

3. The facts in brief which may be relevant for the purpose, with the consent of parties have been noticed from Civil Appeal @ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.4310 of


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top