JUDGMENT :

Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.

With the consent of the parties, hearing of the matters has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.

2. These appeals were tagged together for its analogous hearing as per the prayer made on behalf of learned counsel for the parties since the issues involved in these appeals are identical and against the common judgment passed by learned Single Judge, as such the same were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. These intra-court appeals under Clause 10 of Letters Patent are preferred against the common order/judgment dated 07.06.2021 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P. (S) No. 1533 of 2020 [W.P. (S) No. 494 of 2020 and batch matters], whereby and whereunder writ petitions have been allowed with following directions:

(i). The merit list prepared by the JPSC is held to be illegal as marks of Paper-I was added in the merit list and Clause-13 of the advertisement with regard to minimum qualifying marks in each paper has not been followed and consequence th