D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SURYA KANT, A. S. BOPANNA
Securities and Exchange Board Of India – Appellant
Versus
Rajkumar Nagpal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. timeline of debt and legal actions (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. high court proceedings for debenture holders' rights (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments for sebi circular applicability (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. counterarguments against sebi circular applicability (Para 19 , 20) |
| 5. jurisdiction and implications of sebi circular (Para 63 , 64 , 68) |
| 6. interdependence of ica and resolution plan (Para 70 , 72 , 73) |
| 7. final ruling and implications for dissenters (Para 96 , 98 , 99) |
D.Y. Chandrachud, J.
| A. Facts | |
| i. The dispute | |
| ii. The suit before the Bombay High Court | |
| iii. The impugned judgment | |
| B. Issues | |
| C. Submissions | |
| D. Overview of contractual arrangements | |
| i. The Debenture Trust Deeds | |
| ii. Steps taken by the Debenture/Trustee (Vistra) | |
| E. Evolution of the law surrounding the resolution of debts | |
| i. The framework for the resolution of debt under the COMPANIES ACT 1956 | |
| ii. The RBI Circular dated 6 July 2019 and the legal framework thereafter | |
| iii. SEBI (Debenture Trustee | |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.