SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1064

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.R. SHAH, C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.
Sarup Singh @ Ram Sarup - Appellant
Versus
HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd. and Ors. - Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 7283-7284 of 2022 (@ SLP (C) Nos. 31198-31199 of 2017)
Decided On : 17-10-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Abhimanyu Tewari, AOR, Ms. Eliza Bar, Advocate, Ms. Sanya Kaushal, Advocate, Mr. Tushar Bathija, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sukant Vikram, AOR, Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Adv.

IMPORTANT POINT
Death in motor accident – While awarding loss of dependency, Court must consider future prospects.

Headnote:

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Sections 168 and 173 – Death in motor accident – High Court reduced amount of compensation from Rs. 20,64,000/- as awarded by Claims Tribunal to Rs.11,34,136/-, alongwith 6% interest – Deceased aged 28 years – While awarding loss of dependency, High Court has not awarded/considered future prospects at all – Considering notional income @ Rs. 6,500/- per month as determined by High Court and adding 40% towards future prospects and deducting 1/3rd towards personal expense of deceased and by applying multiple of 17, claimant shall be entitled to Rs. 12,37,790/- under head loss of dependency – Claimant shall also be entitled to Rs. 40,000/- towards parental consortium for minor child; Rs. 40,000/- towards spousal consortium for wife and Rs. 40,000/- towards filial consortium for father of deceased – Claimants shall be entitled to Rs. 1,20,000/- under head loss of consortium – Considering fact that deceased died in year 2012, claimants shall be entitled to interest @ 7.5% p.a. – Total sum of Rs. 13,78,790/- with 7.5% interest awarded as compensation. (Paras 4 and 5)

Facts of the case:

Deceased at the time of accident was of 28 years of age. The original claimants – wife of deceased, minor daughter, father and sister of the deceased filed the claim petition before the Tribunal. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by High Court reducing amount of compensation from Rs. 20,64,000/- as awarded by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal to Rs.11,34,136/- alongwith interest @ 6% p.a., original claimants have preferred the present appeals.

Findings of Court:

Impugned judgment and order passed by High Court is modified and it is held and directed that appellants shall be entitled to a total sum of Rs. 13,78,790/- with interest @ 7.5% p.a. from date of filing of claim petition till realization towards compensation for death of deceased.

Result : Appeals allowed.

JUDGMENT :

M.R. Shah, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court reducing the amount of compensation from Rs. 20,64,000/- as awarded by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the “Tribunal”) to Rs.11,34,136/- alongwith interest @ 6% p.a., the original claimants have preferred the present appeals.

2. The deceased at the time of accident was of 28 years of age. The original claimants – wife of the deceased, minor daughter, father and sister of the deceased filed the claim petition before the Tribunal. The learned Tribunal considered the notional income of the deceased at Rs. 10,000/- per month and thereafter adding 30% towards the future prospect and thereafter deducting 1/4th towards the personal expense of the deceased, awarded Rs. 19,89,000/- under the head loss of dependency. The learned Tribunal also awarded Rs. 25,000/- towards loss of consortium or loss of love and affection and Rs. 50,000/- under the conventional head (funeral expenses and loss of estate). Thus, the learned Tribunal awarded a total sum of Rs.20,64,000/- with interest @ 9% p.a. towards the compensation for the death of the deceased.

3. In an appeal preferred by the insurance company, the High Court has reduced the amount of compensation to Rs. 11,34,136/- by considering the notional income @ Rs. 6,500/- per month and thereafter deducting 1/3rd towards the personal expense of the deceased and determined/awarded Rs. 8,84,136/- under the head loss of dependency. The High Court has also awarded a further sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- towards loss of consortium and Rs. 1,00,000/- towards loss of love and affection for the child and Rs. 50,000/- for loss of estate. However, the High Court has also reduced the rate of interest from 9% p.a. to 6% p.a. The impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court is the subject matter of the present appeal.

4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties and having gone through the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court, we are of the opinion that the amount awarded by the High Court can be said to be on lower side. While awarding the loss of dependency, the High Court has not awarded/considered the future prospects at all. As per the decision of this Court in the case of National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi and Ors., (2017) 16 SCC 680 there shall be 40% rise towards future prospects. Therefore, even if we consider the notional income @ Rs. 6,500/- per month as determined by the High Court and adding 40% towards future prospects and deducting 1/3rd towards personal expense of the deceased and by applying the multiple of 17, the claimant shall be entitled to Rs. 12,37,790/- under the head loss of dependency. Considering the decision of this Court in the case of Pranay Sethi and Ors. (supra) and the recent decision of this Court in the case of Janabai and Ors. v. I.C.I.C.I. Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd., 2022 ACJ 2003 the claimant shall also be entitled to Rs. 40,000/- towards parental consortium for minor child; Rs. 40,000/- towards spousal consortium for wife and Rs. 40,000/- towards filial consortium for the father of the deceased. Thus, the claimants shall be entitled to Rs. 1,20,000/- under the head loss of consortium. The claimants shall also be entitled to Rs. 30,000/- under the conventional head (funeral expense and loss of estate). The High Court has also erred in reducing the interest from 9% p.a. to 6% p.a. Considering the fact that the deceased died in the year 2012, the claimants shall be entitled to the interest @ 7.5% p.a. Thus, the claimants shall be entitled to Rs. 13,87,790/- with interest @ 7.5% p.a.

5. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present appeals are allowed in part. The impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court is modified and it is held and directed that the appellants shall be entitled to a total sum of Rs. 13,7


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top