SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 875

DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL
Sita Batham – Appellant
Versus
Roopnarayan Dwivedi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shri Ram Kishor Sharma- Advocate, for the Appellant; Shri Bal Krishna Agrawal - Advocate for Respondent No, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. Appellants have preferred this appeal being aggrieved by the award passed by the 1st Member Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gwalior, in Claim Case No.127/2009 on 12.7.2010 by which their claim application was partly allowed and Insurance Company was ordered to pay by way of compensation a sum of Rs.3,96,000/-.

2. In brief facts of the case are that on the fateful day i.e. 29.8.2009 husband of appellant No.1 -Brijraj Batham along with his nephew was coming on foot to his house from Lahar Chauraha. At about 9 pm when they reached Jamna Wale Hanumanji, one Indica Car bearing registration No.HR 17-6510 which was being driven rashly and negligently came and dashed deceased Brijraj due to which he got serious injuries. He was brought to CHC and thereafter to Jayarogya Hospital, Gwalior. During treatment, on the same day he died.

3. Thereafter at police Station, Dehat, Distt. Bhind Crime No.368/2009 was registered. At the time of accident, deceased was aged about 36 year and was doing work in Ara machine and was getting Rs.500/- per day. From the aforesaid income, he used to maintain the appellants who were his family members. Due to his death, they became hand to mouth. They pre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top