M. R. SHAH, KRISHNA MURARI
VGP Marine Kingdom Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kay Ellen Arnold – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.R. SHAH, J.
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 05.08.2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in O.P. No. 304/2019, by which, the High Court has dismissed the said application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, 1996) and has refused to appoint an arbitrator and refer the dispute to the arbitrator, original applicant has preferred the present appeal.
2. That the appellants herein approached the High Court under Section 11(6) of the Act, 1996 by way of O.P. No. 304/2019 to appoint an arbitrator so that the arbitral tribunal can be constituted in terms of clause 17.1.2 of the Share Subscription and Shareholders Agreement entered into between the appellants and the respondent at Chennai on 27.04.2016. By the impugned judgment and order the High Court has dismissed the said application and refused to appoint an arbitrator mainly on the grounds that at the time when the application under Section 11(6) of the Act, 1996 was filed in the year 2019, the matter was already referred to the arbitral tribunal with respect to agreement dated 27.04.2016, subseque
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.